Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34535486›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Predicting pain and function outcomes in people consulting with shoulder pain: the PANDA-S clinical cohort and qualitative study protocol.

Gwenllian Wynne-Jones, Helen Myers, Alison Hall, Chris Littlewood, S Hennings, Benjamin Saunders, Milica Bucknall, Sue Jowett, Richard Riley, Simon Wathall and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Gwenllian Wynne-JonesSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK g.wynne-jones@keele.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0283-6632
Helen MyersClinical Trials Unit, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Alison HallSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Chris LittlewoodSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
S HenningsClinical Trials Unit, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Benjamin SaundersSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0856-1596
Milica BucknallSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Sue JowettHealth Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Richard RileySchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Simon WathallClinical Trials Unit, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Carl HeneghanNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1009-1992
Johanna CookNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Tamar PincusPsychology, Royal Hollaway University of London, London, UK.
Christian MallenSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Edward RoddySchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Nadine FosterSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
David BeardNuffield Dept of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Jeremy LewisSchool of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.
J L ReesNuffield Dept of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Adele HigginbottomSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Danielle van der WindtSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7248-6703
Keele University · GBNuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBManchester Metropolitan University · GBRoyal Holloway University of London · GBThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Hertfordshire · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0615-20002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeople presenting with shoulder pain considered to be of musculoskeletal origin is common in primary care but diagnosing the cause of the pain is contentious, leading to uncertainty in management. To inform optimal primary care for patients with shoulder pain, the study aims to (1) to investigate the short-term and long-term outcomes (overall prognosis) of shoulder pain, (2) estimate costs of care, (3) develop a prognostic model for predicting individuals' level and risk of pain and disability at 6 months and (4) investigate experiences and opinions of patients and healthcare professionals regarding diagnosis, prognosis and management of shoulder pain. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Prognostic And Diagnostic Assessment of the Shoulder (PANDA-S) study is a longitudinal clinical cohort with linked qualitative study. At least 400 people presenting to general practice and physiotherapy services in the UK will be recruited. Participants will complete questionnaires at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. Short-term data will be collected weekly between baseline and 12 weeks via Short Message Serevice (SMS) text or software application. Participants will be offered clinical (physiotherapist) and ultrasound (sonographer) assessments at baseline. Qualitative interviews with ≈15 dyads of patients and their healthcare professional (general practitioner or physiotherapist).Short-term and long-term trajectories of Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (using SPADI) will be described, using latent class growth analysis. Health economic analysis will estimate direct costs of care and indirect costs related to work absence and productivity losses. Multivariable regression analysis will be used to develop a prognostic model predicting future levels of pain and disability at 6 months using penalisation methods to adjust for overfitting. The added predictive value of prespecified physical examination tests and ultrasound findings will be examined. For the qualitative interviews an inductive, exploratory framework will be adopted using thematic analysis to investigate decision making, perspectives of patients and clinicians on the importance of diagnostic and prognostic information when negotiating treatment and referral options. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The PANDA-S study has ethical approval from Yorkshire and The Humber-Sheffield Research Ethics Committee, UK (18/YH/0346, IRAS Number: 242750). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, social and mainstream media, professional conferences, and the patient and public involvement and engagement group supporting this study, and through newsletters, leaflets and posters in participating sites. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN46948079.

Indexed as

ShoulderShoulder PainHumansPhysical Therapy ModalitiesPrognosisReferral and Consultationmusculoskeletal disordersprimary careshoulder

Identifiers

PMID34535486
PMCPMC8451291
OpenAlexW3200540917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.