Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34535369›Full record

ArticleThe journal of sexual medicine2021

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Sexual Behaviors: Findings From a National Survey in the United States.

Neil Gleason, Swagata Banik, Jesse Braverman, Eli Coleman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of sexual medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Why Are Gonorrhea Case Rates Declining in the United States? A Research Agenda.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Neil GleasonDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: ngleason@uw.edu.
Swagata BanikCenter for Health Disparities Research & Education, Baldwin Wallace University, Berea, OH, USA.
Jesse BravermanIndependent Scholar, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Eli ColemanProgram in Human Sexuality, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Baldwin–Wallace College · USUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies from the first months of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the resulting lockdown and social distancing measures have shown that there have been decreases in sexual frequency and relationship satisfaction.

aimTo evaluate the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on sexual behavior, relationship satisfaction, and intimate partner violence in the United States using a large national convenience sample.

methodsAbout 1,051 participants across the United States were recruited in October 2020 to complete a cross-sectional online survey. OUTCOMES: Participants were asked to retrospectively report their sexual behavior frequency, relationship satisfaction, and intimate partner violence during the pandemic and prior to the pandemic

resultsThere was a small but significant decrease in some retrospectively-reported partnered sexual activities, and men reported a small increase in masturbation and pornography use. There was no evidence for a change in relationship satisfaction or intimate partner violence, but both men and women reported a small decrease in sexual pleasure, and women reported a small decrease in sexual desire. The sexual behaviors with greatest reduction were casual sex, hookups, and number of partners, and the most diminished as aspect of sexual functioning was sexual enjoyment. Depression symptoms, relationship status, and perceived importance of social distancing emerged as predictors of these reductions. Less than half of individuals who engaged with casual sex partners before the start of the pandemic ceased this behavior completely after the start of the pandemic. Individuals waited on average 6-7 weeks before reengaging in casual sex. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: These results inform public health response to the effects of the pandemic and add to our understanding of how the pandemic has continued to impact sexual behavior. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: This is the first known study to evaluate sexual behavior several months into the COVID-19 pandemic using a large national sample. However, the results of this study are limited by its convenience sampling method and cross-sectional design.

conclusionThese results indicate that the changes in sexual behavior observed in the early months of the pandemic have continued, with small but significant decreases in many partnered sexual behaviors and a small increase in men's solitary sexual behaviors. Gleason N, Banik S, Braverman J, et al. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Sexual Behaviors: Findings From a National Survey in the United States. J Sex Med 2021;18:1851-1862.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsCommunicable Disease ControlCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Sexual BehaviorSexual PartnersUnited StatesCOVID-19Intimate Partner ViolenceRelationship SatisfactionSexual BehaviorSexual Functioning, Sexual FrequencySexual Satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID34535369
PMCPMC8417519
OpenAlexW3195961012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.