ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2021
Exploring women's experiences of participation in shared decision-making during childbirth: a qualitative study at a reference hospital in Spain.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Implementation of a decision aid to promote shared decision-making on mode of birth in low-risk pregnant women: a cross-sectional study within the QUALI-DEC hybrid trial.BMJ global health · 2026Trial
- Health information delivery to patients at risk of having a small for gestational age/growth restricted baby in Aotearoa New Zealand: what can we learn from lived experience?BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Childbirth attitudes in parous and nulliparous women: the roles of cognitive flexibility, perceived social support, and obstetric factors.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of patient involvement in patient safety in cardiovascular surgery intensive care units: a qualitative study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Bridging the Gap: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of a New Rural Maternity Care Center Amid Nationwide Closures.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- A longitudinal study of the subjective birth experience and the relationship to mental health.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Consent and refusal of procedures during labour and birth: a survey among 11 418 women in the Netherlands.BMJ quality & safety · 2024Article
- Maternity healthcare professionals' experiences of supporting women in decision-making for labour and birth: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Does the birth plan match what is relevant to women? Preferences of Spanish women when giving birth.BMC women's health · 2024Article
- Conceptualization of patient-centered care in Latin America: A scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Article
- Informational support and information-seeking during transition to parenthood: Baby Buddy Forward's focus groups with pregnant women and new mothers in Cyprus.European journal of midwifery · 2023Article
- [Effectiveness of the vagino-rectal exudate self-sampling for prenatal screening of Streptococcus agalactiae infection. GALL study].Atencion primaria · 2022Article
- The Birth Plan Experience-A Pilot Qualitative Study in Southern Spain.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWomen's engagement in healthcare decision-making during childbirth has been increasingly emphasised as a priority in maternity care, since it increases satisfaction with the childbirth experience and provides health benefits for women and newborns. The birth plan was developed as a tool to facilitate communication between health professionals and women in Spain, but their value in routine practice has been questioned. Besides, little is known about women's experiences of participation in decision-making in the Spanish context. Thus, this study aimed to explore women's experiences of participation in shared decision-making during hospital childbirth.
methodsAn exploratory qualitative study using focus groups was carried out in one maternity unit of a large reference hospital in Barcelona, Spain. Participants were first-time mothers aged 18 years or older who had had a live birth at the same hospital in the previous 12 months. Data collected were transcribed verbatim and analysed using a six-phase inductive thematic analysis process.
resultsTwenty-three women participated in three focus groups. Three major themes emerged from the data: "Women's low participation in shared decision-making", "Lack of information provision for shared decision-making", and "Suggestions to improve women's participation in shared decision-making". The women who were willing to take an active role in decision-making encountered barriers to achieving this and some women did not feel prepared to do so. The birth plan was experienced as a deficient method to promote women's participation, as health professionals did not use them. Participants described the information given as insufficient and not offered at a timely or useful point where it could aid their decision-making. Potential improvements identified that could promote women's participation were having a mutually respectful relationship with their providers, the support of partners and other members of the family and receiving continuity of a coordinated and personalised perinatal care.
conclusionEnhancing women's involvement in shared decision-making requires the acquisition of skills by health professionals and women. The development and implementation of interventions that encompass a training programme for health professionals and women, accompanied by an effective tool to promote women's participation in shared decision-making during childbirth, is highly recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.