Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34535117›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2021

Exploring women's experiences of participation in shared decision-making during childbirth: a qualitative study at a reference hospital in Spain.

María López-Toribio, Paulina Bravo, Anna Llupià

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bridging the Gap: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of a New Rural Maternity Care Center Amid Nationwide Closures.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Conceptualization of patient-centered care in Latin America: A scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

María López-ToribioPreventive Medicine and Epidemiology Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.
Paulina BravoSchool of Nursing, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. pbbravo@uc.cl.
Anna LlupiàPreventive Medicine and Epidemiology Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CLUniversitat de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen's engagement in healthcare decision-making during childbirth has been increasingly emphasised as a priority in maternity care, since it increases satisfaction with the childbirth experience and provides health benefits for women and newborns. The birth plan was developed as a tool to facilitate communication between health professionals and women in Spain, but their value in routine practice has been questioned. Besides, little is known about women's experiences of participation in decision-making in the Spanish context. Thus, this study aimed to explore women's experiences of participation in shared decision-making during hospital childbirth.

methodsAn exploratory qualitative study using focus groups was carried out in one maternity unit of a large reference hospital in Barcelona, Spain. Participants were first-time mothers aged 18 years or older who had had a live birth at the same hospital in the previous 12 months. Data collected were transcribed verbatim and analysed using a six-phase inductive thematic analysis process.

resultsTwenty-three women participated in three focus groups. Three major themes emerged from the data: "Women's low participation in shared decision-making", "Lack of information provision for shared decision-making", and "Suggestions to improve women's participation in shared decision-making". The women who were willing to take an active role in decision-making encountered barriers to achieving this and some women did not feel prepared to do so. The birth plan was experienced as a deficient method to promote women's participation, as health professionals did not use them. Participants described the information given as insufficient and not offered at a timely or useful point where it could aid their decision-making. Potential improvements identified that could promote women's participation were having a mutually respectful relationship with their providers, the support of partners and other members of the family and receiving continuity of a coordinated and personalised perinatal care.

conclusionEnhancing women's involvement in shared decision-making requires the acquisition of skills by health professionals and women. The development and implementation of interventions that encompass a training programme for health professionals and women, accompanied by an effective tool to promote women's participation in shared decision-making during childbirth, is highly recommended.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthDecision Making, SharedProfessional-Patient RelationsAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHospitalsHumansParturitionPregnancyQualitative ResearchSpainYoung AdultBirth planDelivery roomsDuring childbirthParturitionPatient participationShared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID34535117
PMCPMC8447503
OpenAlexW3199208988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.