Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34535115›Full record

Observational studyBMC infectious diseases2021

The aetiology of pharyngotonsillitis in primary health care: a prospective observational study.

Jon Pallon, Mattias Rööst, Martin Sundqvist, Katarina Hedin

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Different antibiotic treatments for group A streptococcal pharyngitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jon PallonDepartment of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Family Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden. jon.pallon@med.lu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2316-8514
Mattias RööstDepartment of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Family Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Martin SundqvistDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Katarina HedinDepartment of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Family Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Linköping University · SELund University · SEMalmö University · SEÖrebro University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew studies on pharyngotonsillitis have examined the clinical presentation of different aetiologies where pathogens have been detected using molecular methods. We aimed to assess how well clinical signs and symptoms can predict (1) the presence or absence of a broad range of viruses and bacteria, and (2) reconsultations for a sore throat or a complication.

methodsIn this descriptive observational prospective study in primary health care 220 patients aged 15-45 with suspected pharyngotonsillitis were sampled from nose, throat and blood and screened for 20 bacteria and viruses using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), culture and serology. Odds ratios (OR) and predictive values with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to show association between microbiological findings and clinical signs and symptoms. Patients were followed up after 3 months by reviewing electronic medical records.

resultsBoth cough and coryza were more common in patients with only viruses (67%) than in patients with only bacteria (21%) (p < 0.001), whereas tonsillar coating was more common in patients with only bacteria (53%) than in patients with only viruses (29%) (p = 0.006). Tonsillar coating (adjusted OR 6.0; 95% CI 2.5-14) and a lack of cough (adjusted OR 3.5; 95% CI 1.5-8.0) were significantly associated with Streptococcus pyogenes (group A streptococci; GAS) and with any bacterial finding. A Centor score of 3-4 had a positive predictive value of 49% (95% CI 42-57) for GAS and 66% (95% CI 57-74) for any bacterial findings. The use of rapid antigen detection test for GAS increased the positive predictive value for this group to 93%.

conclusionsSigns and symptoms, both single and combined, were insufficient to rule in GAS or other pathogens. However, both cough and coryza were useful to rule out GAS. The results support the clinical approach of restricting rapid antigen detection testing to patients with 3-4 Centor criteria. The low carriage rate of bacteria among asymptomatic controls implied that most detections in patients represented a true infection.

Indexed as

PharyngitisStreptococcal InfectionsHumansPrimary Health CareProspective StudiesStreptococcus pyogenesGroup A streptococciPharyngotonsillitisPredictive valuesPrimary health careSymptoms

Identifiers

PMID34535115
PMCPMC8446737
OpenAlexW3199831338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.