Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34535111›Full record

ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2021

Development and validation of a set of patient reported outcome measures to assess effectiveness of asthma prophylaxis.

Yalini Guruparan, Thiyahiny S Navaratinaraja, Gowry Selvaratnam, Nalika Gunawardena, Shalini Sri Ranganathan

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yalini GuruparanDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jaffna, Jaffna, Sri Lanka. yalinig@univ.jfn.ac.lk.
Thiyahiny S NavaratinarajaDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jaffna, Jaffna, Sri Lanka.
Gowry SelvaratnamDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jaffna, Jaffna, Sri Lanka.
Nalika GunawardenaWorld Health Organization, Country Office, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Shalini Sri RanganathanDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
University of Jaffna · LKUniversity of Colombo · LK

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the local setting, asthma control is assessed by symptoms and signs elicited by clinicians because of the limited availability of spirometry. Hence, we intended to develop a patient reported outcome measure (PROM) with more holistic interpretation that could also serve as a tool to measure the asthma control in resource limited settings. Therefore, this study was carried out in Northern Sri Lanka to develop and validate the Asthma Control PROM (AC-PROM) Tamil to measure the effectiveness of asthma prophylaxis based on symptoms, exacerbation and limitation of activity which could also serve as an easy measure of asthma control to the provider.

methodsThe AC-PROM Tamil was developed in 3 steps: item generation, item reduction and psychometric evaluation. Items were generated through thematic analysis from focus group discussions among patients with asthma. Items were converted to an interviewer administered questionnaire in Tamil in the format of 5-point Likert scale. Item reduction was done by two rounds of online Delphi surveys among 10 experts and an exploratory factor analysis among 200 patients with asthma. The face and content validity were assessed by a panel of experts during Delphi survey and patients during the pre-test of the tool. Criterion validity of the tool was assessed against the forced expiratory volume in one second of 187 patients with asthma. The cut-off value to assess the asthma control was determined by receiver operating characteristic curve. Reliability was verified by Cronbach's alpha coefficient.

resultsFrom thematic analysis of focus group discussions 10 items were generated. One item was removed during Delphi survey. Exploratory factor analysis indicated removal of another item with 8 items categorised into two factors. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of factors 1 and 2 were 0.821 and 0.903 respectively, indicating good reliability. Observations made by experts and responses made by patients were incorporated to improve the clarity and relevance of the items. Criterion validity was demonstrated by significant correlation between the AC-PROM Tamil and forced expiratory volume in one second (r = 0.66, p = 0.001). The cut-off value of the AC-PROM Tamil to detect asthma control was 28.5 with 79% (95% CI 71.3-86.9) sensitivity and 71% (95% CI 61.9-79.6) specificity. The AC-PROM Tamil showed moderate accuracy (the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.796; 95% CI 0.73-0.86). Response rate of the AC-PROM Tamil was 100% and time taken to complete was 3-4 min.

conclusionThe AC-PROM Tamil is a simple, feasible and reasonably accurate tool to assesses the effectiveness of asthma prophylaxis, particularly in resource limited settings.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdultAgedAsthmaFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveSri LankaSurveys and QuestionnairesAsthma controlDevelopmentEffectivenessInhaled medicationsPatient reported outcome measureValidation

Identifiers

PMID34535111
PMCPMC8449463
OpenAlexW3132616223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.