Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34535091›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2021

Prevention of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) transmission in residential aged care using ultraviolet light (PETRA): a two-arm crossover randomised controlled trial protocol.

Amanda Brass, Andrew P Shoubridge, Maria Crotty, Lidia Morawska, Scott C Bell, Ming Qiao, Richard J Woodman, Craig Whitehead, Maria C Inacio, Caroline Miller and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda BrassThe South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Andrew P ShoubridgeThe South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia. andrew.shoubridge@sahmri.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5148-4063
Maria CrottyThe South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Lidia MorawskaInternational Laboratory for Air Quality and Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Scott C BellThe Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Ming QiaoSA Pathology, SA Health, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Richard J WoodmanThe South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Craig WhiteheadThe South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Maria C InacioThe South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Caroline MillerThe South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Megan CorlisAustralian Nursing & Midwifery Federation, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Nicolas LarbyAged Care Property Services Management, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Levi ElmsThe South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Sarah K SimsThe South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Steven L TaylorThe South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Erin FlynnThe South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Lito E PapanicolasThe South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Geraint B RogersThe South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Flinders University · AUSouth Australian Health and Medical Research Institute · AUSouth Australia Pathology · AUAustralian National University · AUQueensland University of Technology · AUThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of South Australia · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council GNT2005904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSARS-CoV-2 poses a considerable threat to those living in residential aged care facilities (RACF). RACF COVID-19 outbreaks have been characterised by the rapid spread of infection and high rates of severe disease and associated mortality. Despite a growing body of evidence supporting airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2, current infection control measures in RACF including hand hygiene, social distancing, and sterilisation of surfaces, focus on contact and droplet transmission. Germicidal ultraviolet (GUV) light has been used widely to prevent airborne pathogen transmission. Our aim is to investigate the efficacy of GUV technology in reducing the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in RACF.

methodsA multicentre, two-arm double-crossover, randomised controlled trial will be conducted to determine the efficacy of GUV devices to reduce respiratory viral transmission in RACF, as an adjunct to existing infection control measures. The study will be conducted in partnership with three aged care providers in metropolitan and regional South Australia. RACF will be separated into paired within-site zones, then randomised to intervention order (GUV or control). The initial 6-week period will be followed by a 2-week washout before crossover to the second 6-week period. After accounting for estimated within-zone and within-facility correlations of infection, and baseline infection rates (10 per 100 person-days), a sample size of n = 8 zones (n = 40 residents/zone) will provide 89% power to detect a 50% reduction in symptomatic infection rate. The primary outcome will be the incidence rate ratio of combined symptomatic respiratory infections for intervention versus control. Secondary outcomes include incidence rates of hospitalisation for complications associated with respiratory infection; respiratory virus detection in facility air and fomite samples; rates of laboratory confirmed respiratory illnesses and genomic characteristics. DISCUSSION: Measures that can be deployed rapidly into RACF, that avoid the requirement for changes in resident and staff behaviour, and that are effective in reducing the risk of airborne SARS-CoV-2 transmission, would provide considerable benefit in safeguarding a highly vulnerable population. In addition, such measures might substantially reduce rates of other respiratory viruses, which contribute considerably to resident morbidity and mortality. Trial registration Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12621000567820 (registered on 14th May, 2021).

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2AgedAustraliaHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeUltraviolet RaysCOVID-19Germicidal ultraviolet lightHealth care qualityResidential aged careRespiratory virus infectionSARS-CoV-2Transmission

Identifiers

PMID34535091
PMCPMC8446719
OpenAlexW3200902897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.