Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34534863›Full record

Trial reportDrug and alcohol dependence2021

Optimizing opioid use disorder treatment with naltrexone or buprenorphine.

Kara E Rudolph, Iván Díaz, Sean X Luo, John Rotrosen, Edward V Nunes

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kara E RudolphDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States. Electronic address: kr2854@cumc.columbia.edu.
Iván DíazDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Sean X LuoDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Columbia University, and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, United States.
John RotrosenDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, United States.
Edward V NunesDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Columbia University, and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, United States.
New York Psychoanalytic Society and Institute · USColumbia University · USNew York University · USWeill Cornell Medicine · US

Funding

Mechanisms linking neighborhood poverty to problematic adolescent drug useR00DA042127 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI RUDOLPH, KARA ELIZABETH · 2018 to 2021
$889k
NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA042127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRelapse rates during opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment remain unacceptably high. It is possible that optimally matching patients with medication type would reduce risk of relapse. Our objective was to learn a rule by which to assign type of medication for OUD to reduce risk of relapse, and to estimate the extent to which risk of relapse would be reduced if such a rule were used.

methodsThis was a secondary analysis of an open-label randomized controlled, 24-week comparative effectiveness trial of injection extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX), delivered approximately every 28 days, or daily sublingual buprenorphine-naloxone (BUP-NX) for treating OUD, 2014-2017 (N = 570). Outcome was a binary indicator of relapse to regular opioid use during the 24 weeks of outpatient treatment.

resultsWe found that applying an estimated individualized treatment rule-i.e., a rule that assigns patients with OUD to either XR-NTX or BUP-NX based on their individual characteristics in such a way that risk of relapse is minimized-would reduce risk of relapse by 24 weeks by 12% compared to randomly assigned treatment.

conclusionsThe number-needed-to-treat with the estimated treatment rule to prevent a single relapse is 14. A simpler, alternative estimated rule in which homeless participants would be treated with XR-NTX and stably housed participants would be treated with BUP-NX performed similarly. These results provide an estimate of the amount by which a relatively simple change in clinical practice could be expected to improve prevention of OUD relapse.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineOpioid-Related DisordersDelayed-Action PreparationsHumansInjections, IntramuscularNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsBuprenorphineDelayed-Action PreparationsNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsBuprenorphineIndividualized optimal treatment regimesNaltrexoneOpioid use disorder

Identifiers

PMID34534863
PMCPMC8595679
OpenAlexW3198985755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.