ArticleGenomics2021
Characterization of full-length LINE-1 insertions in 154 genomes.
Article in Genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-ancestry GWAS reveals loci linked to human variation in LINE-1- and Alu-insertion numbers.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Multi-ancestry GWAS reveals loci linked to human variation in LINE-1- and Alu-insertion numbers.Translational medicine of aging · 2025Article
- Construction of a co-expression network and mining of core genes for genic male sterility in sweet pepper based on transcriptome and WGCNA analysis.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Detection of Transgene Location in the CYP2A13/2B6/2F1-transgenic Mouse Model using Optical Genome Mapping Technology.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2023Article
- Methodological and Biological Factors Influencing Global DNA Methylation Results Measured by LINE-1 Pyrosequencing Assay in Colorectal Tissue and Liquid Biopsy Samples.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs) are retrotransposons that contribute to genetic variation in the human genome. LINE-1 elements in larger-scale studies are challenging to identify using sequencing technologies due to cost and scalability. We developed an approach using optical mapping for detection of full-length LINE-1 insertions and 10× sequencing for confirmation. We found 51 true positive full-length LINE-1 insertions, of which 4 are novel insertions, in NA12878. Repeating our analysis on a larger sample set representing 26 populations, we identified 329 full-length LINE-1 elements, of which 123 are novel. 24.8% of these 329 LINE-1 insertions were shared amongst all 5 superpopulations (AFR, AMR, EUR, EAS, SAS). The African superpopulation has a higher percentage of population-specific LINE-1 insertions than any other superpopulation. These data indicate that our approach can provide high-speed, cost-effective, and increased accuracy for LINE-1 detection. These data also provide an insight into variations of LINE-1 elements between different populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.