Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34534312›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2021

A predictive model for next cycle start date that accounts for adherence in menstrual self-tracking.

Kathy Li, Iñigo Urteaga, Amanda Shea, Virginia J Vitzthum, Chris H Wiggins, Noémie Elhadad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The messiness of the menstruator: assessing personas and functionalities of menstrual tracking apps.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Predictive models: important problems and innovative methods.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kathy LiDepartment of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics/Data Science Institute, Columbia University, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0777-7256
Iñigo UrteagaDepartment of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics/Data Science Institute, Columbia University, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3656-0037
Amanda SheaClue by BioWink, Berlin, Germany.
Virginia J VitzthumClue by BioWink, Berlin, Germany.
Chris H WigginsDepartment of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics/Data Science Institute, Columbia University, New York, USA.
Noémie ElhadadDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, USA.

Funding

PhendoPHL:A Data-Science Enabled Personal Health Library to Manage EndometriosisR01LM013043 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ELHADAD, NOEMIE · 2019 to 2022
$1.4M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe study sought to build predictive models of next menstrual cycle start date based on mobile health self-tracked cycle data. Because app users may skip tracking, disentangling physiological patterns of menstruation from tracking behaviors is necessary for the development of predictive models. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe use data from a popular menstrual tracker (186 000 menstruators with over 2 million tracked cycles) to learn a predictive model, which (1) accounts explicitly for self-tracking adherence; (2) updates predictions as a given cycle evolves, allowing for interpretable insight into how these predictions change over time; and (3) enables modeling of an individual's cycle length history while incorporating population-level information.

resultsCompared with 5 baselines (mean, median, convolutional neural network, recurrent neural network, and long short-term memory network), the model yields better predictions and consistently outperforms them as the cycle evolves. The model also provides predictions of skipped tracking probabilities. DISCUSSION: Mobile health apps such as menstrual trackers provide a rich source of self-tracked observations, but these data have questionable reliability, as they hinge on user adherence to the app. By taking a machine learning approach to modeling self-tracked cycle lengths, we can separate true cycle behavior from user adherence, allowing for more informed predictions and insights into the underlying observed data structure.

conclusionsDisentangling physiological patterns of menstruation from adherence allows for accurate and informative predictions of menstrual cycle start date and is necessary for mobile tracking apps. The proposed predictive model can support app users in being more aware of their self-tracking behavior and in better understanding their cycle dynamics.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsTelemedicineFemaleHumansMenstrual CycleMenstruationReproducibility of Resultsmachine learningmenstruationmobile applicationsself-management

Identifiers

PMID34534312
PMCPMC8714275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.