Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34534296›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2021

Plastome Structural Evolution and Homoplastic Inversions in Neo-Astragalus (Fabaceae).

Joseph L M Charboneau, Richard C Cronn, Aaron Liston, Martin F Wojciechowski, Michael J Sanderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Polyphyly ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Comparative analysis of 84 chloroplast genomes ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joseph L M CharboneauDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0136-735X
Richard C CronnPacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Aaron ListonDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Martin F WojciechowskiSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
Michael J SandersonDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0855-9648

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The plastid genomes of photosynthetic green plants have largely maintained conserved gene content and order as well as structure over hundreds of millions of years of evolution. Several plant lineages, however, have departed from this conservation and contain many plastome structural rearrangements, which have been associated with an abundance of repeated sequences both overall and near rearrangement endpoints. We sequenced the plastomes of 25 taxa of Astragalus L. (Fabaceae), a large genus in the inverted repeat-lacking clade of legumes, to gain a greater understanding of the connection between repeats and plastome inversions. We found plastome repeat structure has a strong phylogenetic signal among these closely related taxa mostly in the New World clade of Astragalus called Neo-Astragalus. Taxa without inversions also do not differ substantially in their overall repeat structure from four taxa each with one large-scale inversion. For two taxa with inversion endpoints between the same pairs of genes, differences in their exact endpoints indicate the inversions occurred independently. Our proposed mechanism for inversion formation suggests the short inverted repeats now found near the endpoints of the four inversions may be there as a result of these inversions rather than their cause. The longer inverted repeats now near endpoints may have allowed the inversions first mediated by shorter microhomologous sequences to propagate, something that should be considered in explaining how any plastome rearrangement becomes fixed regardless of the mechanism of initial formation.

Indexed as

FabaceaeGenome, PlastidBase SequenceEvolution, MolecularPhylogenyRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acidchloroplastinverted repeat-lacking cladelegumesmicrohomology-mediated rearrangementsplastid genome

Identifiers

PMID34534296
PMCPMC8486006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.