Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34534259›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Isothermal amplification and fluorescent detection of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV-2 variant virus in nasopharyngeal swabs.

Les Jones, Abhijeet Bakre, Hemant Naikare, Ravindra Kolhe, Susan Sanchez, Yung-Yi C Mosley, Ralph A Tripp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Standardization and performance of SARS-CoV-2 RT-LAMP detection: a reliable, inexpensive, and alternative diagnostic assay.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Les JonesDepartment of Infectious Disease, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.
Abhijeet BakreDepartment of Infectious Disease, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.
Hemant NaikareDepartment of Infectious Disease, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.
Ravindra KolheState of Georgia COVID-19 Taskforce, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8283-2403
Susan SanchezDepartment of Infectious Disease, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.
Yung-Yi C MosleyDepartment of Infectious Disease, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.
Ralph A TrippDepartment of Infectious Disease, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2924-9956

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 is a serious health threat causing worldwide morbidity and mortality. Real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) is currently the standard for SARS-CoV-2 detection. Although various nucleic acid-based assays have been developed to aid the detection of SARS-CoV-2 from COVID-19 patient samples, the objective of this study was to develop a diagnostic test that can be completed in 30 minutes without having to isolate RNA from the samples. Here, we present an RNA amplification detection method performed using reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) reactions to achieve specific, rapid (30 min), and sensitive (<100 copies) fluorescent detection in real-time of SARS-CoV-2 directly from patient nasopharyngeal swab (NP) samples. When compared to RT-qPCR, positive NP swab samples assayed by fluorescent RT-LAMP had 98% (n = 41/42) concordance and negative NP swab samples assayed by fluorescent RT-LAMP had 87% (n = 59/68) concordance for the same samples. Importantly, the fluorescent RT-LAMP results were obtained without purification of RNA from the NP swab samples in contrast to RT-qPCR. We also show that the fluorescent RT-LAMP assay can specifically detect live virus directly from cultures of both SARS-CoV-2 wild type (WA1/2020), and a SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 (alpha) variant strain with equal sensitivity to RT-qPCR. RT-LAMP has several advantages over RT-qPCR including isothermal amplification, speed (<30 min), reduced costs, and similar sensitivity and specificity.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 Nucleic Acid TestingDiagnostic Tests, RoutineHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2Sensitivity and SpecificityRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID34534259
PMCPMC8448339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.