ArticlePloS one2021
Time-of-day changes in physician clinical decision making: A retrospective study.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- An integrative review on unveiling the causes and effects of decision fatigue to develop a multi-domain conceptual framework.Frontiers in cognition · 2025Pooled it
- Associations of system noise with lumbar puncture and hospitalization for young febrile infants: a cross-sectional study.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Cognitive Ergonomics: Addressing Decision Fatigue in Dentistry.Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects · 2026Article
- Use of Paracervical Blocks for Patients Who Undergo Intrauterine Device Insertion.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Impact of time-of-shift on diagnostic service requests in a pediatric emergency department: a retrospective study.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Observational
- The role of AI and personalized medicine in healthcare: balancing technological advancements and the art of medicine.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Patient-Provider Race Concordance and Primary Care Suicide Risk Screening in the Veterans Health Administration.Health services research · 2025Article
- Decision fatigue in hospital settings: A scoping review.Journal of hospital medicine · 2025Article
- Context factors in clinical decision-making: a scoping review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Lengthy Shifts and Decision Fatigue in Out-of-Hours Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Article
- No evidence for decision fatigue using large-scale field data from healthcare.Communications psychology · 2025Article
- Biased Language in Simulated Handoffs and Clinician Recall and Attitudes.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease Associated with Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTime of day has been associated with variations in certain clinical practices such as cancer screening rates. In this study, we assessed how more general process measures of physician activity, particularly rates of diagnostic test ordering and diagnostic assessments, might be affected by time of day.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective chart review of 3,342 appointments by 20 attending physicians at five outpatient clinics, matching appointments by physician and comparing the average diagnostic tests ordered and average diagnoses assessed per appointment in the first hour of the day versus the last hour of the day. Statistical analyses used sign tests, two-sample t-tests, Wilcoxon tests, Kruskal Wallis tests, and multivariate linear regression.
resultsExamining physicians individually, four and six physicians, respectively, had statistically significant first- versus last-hour differences in the number of diagnostic tests ordered and number of diagnoses assessed per patient visit (p ≤ 0.04). As a group, 16 of 20 physicians ordered more tests on average in the first versus last hour (p = 0.012 for equal chance to order more in each time period). Substantial intra-clinic heterogeneity was found in both outcomes for four of five clinics (p < 0.01).
conclusionsThere is some statistical evidence on an individual and group level to support the presence of time-of-day effects on the number of diagnostic tests ordered per patient visit. These findings suggest that time of day may be a factor influencing fundamental physician behavior and processes. Notably, many physicians exhibited significant variation in the primary outcomes compared to same-specialty peers. Additional work is necessary to clarify temporal and inter-physician variation in the outcomes of interest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.