Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34534230›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal carriage among patients with diabetes at the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital.

Ramzy B Anafo, Yacoba Atiase, Fleischer C N Kotey, Nicholas T K D Dayie, Patience B Tetteh-Quarcoo, Samuel Duodu, Mary-Magdalene Osei, Khalid J Alzahrani, Eric S Donkor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Frequency and Molecular Characterization ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Microbiology insights · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ramzy B AnafoDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Ghana Medical School, Korle Bu, Accra, Ghana.
Yacoba AtiaseDepartment of Medicine, University of Ghana Medical School, Korle Bu, Accra, Ghana.
Fleischer C N KoteyDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Ghana Medical School, Korle Bu, Accra, Ghana.
Nicholas T K D DayieDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Ghana Medical School, Korle Bu, Accra, Ghana.
Patience B Tetteh-QuarcooDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Ghana Medical School, Korle Bu, Accra, Ghana.
Samuel DuoduDepartment of Biochemistry, Cell and Molecular Biology and West African Centre for Cell Biology of Infectious Pathogens, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
Mary-Magdalene OseiDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Ghana Medical School, Korle Bu, Accra, Ghana.
Khalid J AlzahraniDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6688-0106
Eric S DonkorDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Ghana Medical School, Korle Bu, Accra, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0002-9368-0636
University of Ghana · GHTaif University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate the epidemiology of S. aureus and MRSA nasal carriage among people with diabetes at the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital in Accra, including the prevalence, predictors of carriage, and antibiotic resistance. METHODOLOGY: This study was cross-sectional, involving 300 diabetes patients and 106 non-diabetic individuals. Swab specimens of the nares were obtained from the participants and bacteriologically-cultured. Identification and characterization of S. aureus and MRSA were based on standard bacteriological methods; antimicrobial susceptibility testing was by the Kirby-Bauer method.

resultsThe prevalence of staphylococcal carriage, the diabetes group relative to the non-diabetes group, were 31.0% and 10.4% (S. aureus), and 3.3% and 0.0% (MRSA). Presence of diabetes predisposed to S. aureus carriage, but not MRSA nor coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) carriage (OR = 3.88; p < 0.0001). Colonization with CoNS was protective of S. aureus (OR = 0.039, p < 0.001) and MRSA (OR = 0.115, p = 0.043) colonization among the diabetics. The antimicrobial resistance patterns recorded among the S. aureus isolated from the diabetic individuals relative to the non-diabetics were as follows: penicillin (95% vs. 91%), tetracycline (37% vs. 27%), cotrimoxazole (30% vs. 36%), erythromycin (17% vs. 0%), norfloxacin (13% vs. 0%), clindamycin (12% vs. 0%), gentamicin (9% vs. 0%), fusidic acid (10% vs. 9%), linezolid (4% vs. 0%), and rifampicin (5% vs. 0%). The proportion of multidrug resistant S. aureus was 41% (n = 38) in the diabetes group and 0% in the non-diabetes group; this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.01).

conclusionsThe presence of diabetes predisposed the participants to S. aureus carriage by almost four folds, but not MRSA carriage. Colonization with CoNS was protective of S. aureus and MRSA carriage in the diabetes group. Finally, linezolid remains a good therapeutic agent for anti-MRSA therapy.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialAdolescentAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarrier StateClindamycinCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes MellitusErythromycinFemaleFusidic AcidGentamicinsHumansLinezolidMaleAnti-Bacterial AgentsClindamycinErythromycinFusidic AcidGentamicinsLinezolidNorfloxacinPenicillinsRifampinTetracyclineTrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination

Identifiers

PMID34534230
PMCPMC8448364
OpenAlexW3199426197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.