Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34533568›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Assessment of Hearing Screening Combined With Limited and Expanded Genetic Screening for Newborns in Nantong, China.

Qing-Wen Zhu, Mu-Ting Li, Xun Zhuang, Kai Chen, Wan-Qing Xu, Yin-Hua Jiang, Gang Qin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Recent Progress in Mechanism-Based Therapies forInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. [Genetics of pediatric hearing loss].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2023
    Review
  14. [The critical thoughts on diagnosis and treatment of childhood hearing loss].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Analysis ofAvicenna journal of medical biotechnology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qing-Wen ZhuClinical Medicine Research Center, Nantong Maternal and Child Health Hospital affiliated to Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Mu-Ting LiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Nantong University School of Public Health, Nantong, China.
Xun ZhuangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Nantong University School of Public Health, Nantong, China.
Kai ChenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Nantong University Medical School, Nantong, China.
Wan-Qing XuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Nantong University Medical School, Nantong, China.
Yin-Hua JiangClinical Medicine Research Center, Nantong Maternal and Child Health Hospital affiliated to Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Gang QinDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Nantong University School of Public Health, Nantong, China.
Nantong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Early identification and intervention for newborns with hearing loss (HL) may lead to improved physiological and social-emotional outcomes. The current newborn hearing screening is generally beneficial but improvements can be made. Objective: To assess feasibility and evaluate utility of a modified genetic and hearing screening program for newborn infants. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cohort study used a 4-stage genetic and hearing screening program at 6 local hospitals in Nantong city, China. Participants were newborn infants born between January 2016 and June 2020 from the Han population. Statistical analysis was performed from April 1 to May 1, 2021. Exposures: Limited genetic screening for 15 variants in 4 common HL-associated genes and newborn hearing screening (NHS) were offered concurrently to all newborns. Hearing rescreening and/or diagnostic tests were provided for infants with evidence of HL on NHS or genetic variants on screening. Expanded genetic tests for a broader range of genes were targeted to infants with HL with negative results of limited genetic tests. Main Outcomes and Measures: The detection capability for infants with hearing impairment who passed conventional hearing screening, as well as infants with normal hearing at risk of late-onset HL due to genetic susceptibility. Results: Among a total of 35 930 infants, 32 512 infants completed the follow-up and were included for analysis. Among the infants included in the analysis, all were from the Han population in China and 52.3% (16 988) were male. The modified genetic and hearing screening program revealed 142 cases of HL and 1299 cases of genetic variation. The limited genetic screening helped identify 31 infants who passed newborn hearing screening, reducing time for diagnosis and intervention; 425 infants with normal hearing with pathogenic SLC26A4 variation and 92 infants with MT-RNR1 variation were at risk for enlarged vestibular aqueduct and aminoglycoside-induced ototoxicity respectively, indicating early aversive or preventive management. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that performing modified genetic and hearing screening in newborns was feasible and provides evidence that the program could identify additional subgroups of infants who need early intervention. These findings suggest an advantage for universal adoption of such a practice.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingHearing TestsChinaEarly DiagnosisFeasibility StudiesFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic VariationGenotypeHearing LossHumansInfant, NewbornMaleNeonatal ScreeningPhenotypePilot Projects

Identifiers

PMID34533568
PMCPMC8449278
OpenAlexW3199476782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.