ArticleJAMA network open2021
Assessment of Hearing Screening Combined With Limited and Expanded Genetic Screening for Newborns in Nantong, China.
Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent Progress in Mechanism-Based Therapies forInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Concurrent physiologic and gene-based genetic newborn hearing screening in a general population.Human genomics · 2026Article
- Pediatric hearing loss in the universal newborn hearing screening era: etiologies, risk indicators, and clinical phenotypes.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- A survey of strategies for the early diagnosis of hearing loss in infants: a scoping review.CoDAS · 2026Article
- External quality assessment of genetic testing for hereditary hearing loss in Shanghai and other regions.Practical laboratory medicine · 2025Article
- Targeted gene sequencing and hearing follow-up in 7501 newborns reveals an improved strategy for newborn hearing screening.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Article
- Estimated cost-effectiveness of early screening strategies for newborn hearing impairment using a Markov model.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Newborn concurrent hearing and genetic screening for hearing impairment: A systematic review and meta‑analysis.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2024Article
- Economic evaluation of newborn deafness gene screening as a public health intervention in China: a modelling study.BMJ public health · 2024Article
- A novel intronic variant causing aberrant splicing identified in two deaf Chinese siblings with enlarged vestibular aqueducts.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2024Article
- Multicolor melting curve analysis discloses high carrier frequency of hearing loss-associated variants among neonates in Jiangsu province.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2024Observational
- Analysis of audiological outcomes of children referred from a universal newborn hearing screening program over 9 years in Beijing, China.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- [Genetics of pediatric hearing loss].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2023Review
- [The critical thoughts on diagnosis and treatment of childhood hearing loss].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2023Article
- Association Between Expanded Genomic Sequencing Combined With Hearing Screening and Detection of Hearing Loss Among Newborns in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Concurrent newborn hearing and genetic screening of common hearing loss variants with bloodspot-based targeted next generation sequencing in Jiangxi province.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Analysis ofAvicenna journal of medical biotechnologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Early identification and intervention for newborns with hearing loss (HL) may lead to improved physiological and social-emotional outcomes. The current newborn hearing screening is generally beneficial but improvements can be made. Objective: To assess feasibility and evaluate utility of a modified genetic and hearing screening program for newborn infants. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cohort study used a 4-stage genetic and hearing screening program at 6 local hospitals in Nantong city, China. Participants were newborn infants born between January 2016 and June 2020 from the Han population. Statistical analysis was performed from April 1 to May 1, 2021. Exposures: Limited genetic screening for 15 variants in 4 common HL-associated genes and newborn hearing screening (NHS) were offered concurrently to all newborns. Hearing rescreening and/or diagnostic tests were provided for infants with evidence of HL on NHS or genetic variants on screening. Expanded genetic tests for a broader range of genes were targeted to infants with HL with negative results of limited genetic tests. Main Outcomes and Measures: The detection capability for infants with hearing impairment who passed conventional hearing screening, as well as infants with normal hearing at risk of late-onset HL due to genetic susceptibility. Results: Among a total of 35 930 infants, 32 512 infants completed the follow-up and were included for analysis. Among the infants included in the analysis, all were from the Han population in China and 52.3% (16 988) were male. The modified genetic and hearing screening program revealed 142 cases of HL and 1299 cases of genetic variation. The limited genetic screening helped identify 31 infants who passed newborn hearing screening, reducing time for diagnosis and intervention; 425 infants with normal hearing with pathogenic SLC26A4 variation and 92 infants with MT-RNR1 variation were at risk for enlarged vestibular aqueduct and aminoglycoside-induced ototoxicity respectively, indicating early aversive or preventive management. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that performing modified genetic and hearing screening in newborns was feasible and provides evidence that the program could identify additional subgroups of infants who need early intervention. These findings suggest an advantage for universal adoption of such a practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.