ArticleJMIR formative research2021
Implementation of an Automated Dispensing Cabinet System and Its Impact on Drug Administration: Longitudinal Study.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of a Hospital Information System-Integrated Automated Dispensing Cabinet on Medication Use and Safety in a Tertiary Hospital Emergency Department: A Prospective Before-and-After Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Automated dispensing cabinets and nurse-related medication errors in inpatient settings: A systematic review.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026Review
- Implementing six sigma management to shorten the time of taking medicine from intelligent medicine cabinet in inpatient ward.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2025Article
- Analysis of the efficiency and effectiveness of technology transformation through the introduction of ADC in the Emergency Department: a Taiwanese case study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Benefits and challenges associated with implementation and ongoing use of automated dispensing cabinet for medicines: A scoping review.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2025Article
- Exploring the Benefits, Barriers and Improvement Opportunities in Implementing Automated Dispensing Cabinets: A Qualitative Study.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Automated Dispensing Cabinet Stocking Schedule and Inventory Management Optimization.HCA healthcare journal of medicine · 2025Article
- Automated dispensing cabinets and their impact on the rate of omitted and delayed doses: A systematic review.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2024Article
- Effect of an automated dispensing cabinet system on drug distribution effectiveness in a surgical unit.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Improving Inpatient Medication Dispensing with an Automated System.Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA technology that has been widely implemented in hospitals in the United States is the automated dispensing cabinet (ADC), which has been shown to reduce nurse drug administration errors and the time nurses spend administering drugs.
objectiveThis study aimed to determine the impact of an ADC system on medication administration by nurses as well as safety before and after ADC implementation.
methodsWe conducted a 24-month-long longitudinal study at the National Taiwan University Hospital in Taipei, Taiwan. Clinical observations and questionnaires were used to evaluate the time differences in drug preparation, delivery, and returns in the inpatient ward by nurses before and after using the ADC. Drug errors recorded in the Medical Incident Events system were assessed the year before and after ADC implementation.
resultsThe drug preparation time of the wards increased significantly (all P<.005). On average, 2 minutes of preparation time is needed for each patient. Only 1 unit showed an increase in the drug return time, but this was not significant. There were 9 (45%) adverse events during the drug administration phase, and 11 (55%) events occurred during the drug-dispensing phase. Although a decrease in the mean number of events reported was observed during the ADC implementation period, this difference was not significant. As for the questionnaire that were administered to the nurses, the overall mean score was 3.90; the highest score was for the item "I now spend less time waiting for medications that come from the pharmacy than before the ADC was implemented" (score=4.24). The item with the lowest score was "I have to wait in line to get my patient medications" (score=3.32).
conclusionsThe nurses were generally satisfied with ADC use over the 9 months following complete implementation and integration of the system. It was acknowledged that the ADC offers benefits in terms of pharmaceutical stock management; however, this comes at the cost of increased nursing time. In general, the nurses remained supportive of the benefits for their patients, despite consequences to their workflows. Their acceptance of the ADC system in this study demonstrates this.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.