Observational studyJAMA internal medicine2021
Comparison of Routine Replacement With Clinically Indicated Replacement of Peripheral Intravenous Catheters.
Observational study in JAMA internal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparison of clinically indicated replacement and routine replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Epidemiological and Molecular Surveillance of Multiresistant Citrobacter freundii Complex in a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Retrospective Cohort Study.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Infection risk of peripheral intravenous catheters: meta-synthesis of 18 prospective studies with 14,606 catheters.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2025Article
- Epidemiology of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections in haemato-oncology patients in Geneva, Switzerland.Infection · 2025Article
- Secular trends of bloodstream infections in hemodialysis patients: insights from a longitudinal Swiss study.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2025Article
- Definitions and Occurrence of Unused Short Peripheral Intravenous Catheters in Different Care Settings: A Scoping Review.Nursing open · 2025Article
- Dwell Time and Risk of Bloodstream Infection With Peripheral Intravenous Catheters.JAMA network open · 2025Observational
- Risk Factors for Bloodstream Infection in Patients Receiving Peripheral Parenteral Nutrition.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025Article
- Incidence of local complications following implementation of alcoholic chlorhexidine for peripheral venous catheter site disinfection.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025Article
- Increase in PVC-BSI during the second COVID-19 pandemic year: analysis of catheter and patient characteristics.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2024Article
- Non-Adherence to Peripheral Venous Catheter Care Protocols Significantly Decreases Patient Safety and Impacts Costs: A Retrospective Observational Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Increased Peripheral Venous Catheter Bloodstream Infections during COVID-19 Pandemic, Switzerland.Emerging infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Severe pain management in the emergency department: patient pathway as a new factor associated with IV morphine prescription.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Observational
- Best practice in the use of peripheral venous catheters: A scoping review and expert consensus.Infection prevention in practice · 2023Article
- The factors associated with the trend in incidence of Bacteraemia and associated mortality over 30 years.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Preventing healthcare-associated MRSA bacteremia: getting to the root of the problem.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2023Article
- Lower risk of peripheral venous catheter-related bloodstream infection by hand insertion.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2022Article
- Peripheral vascular catheter use in Latin America (the vascular study): A multinational cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Peripheral intravenous catheters (PVCs) are the most frequently used indwelling devices in hospitals worldwide. Peripheral intravenous catheter bloodstream infections (PVC-BSIs) are rare, but severe and preventable, adverse events. Objective: To investigate the incidence of PVC-BSIs after changing the policy of routine PVC replacement every 96 hours to clinically indicated replacement. Design, Setting, and Participants: This institution-wide, observational cohort study evaluated all patients hospitalized at a large university-affiliated hospital with 10 sites in Western Switzerland with a PVC insertion between January 1, 2016, and February 29, 2020. Exposures: Peripheral intravenous catheters were routinely replaced every 96 hours until March 31, 2018 (baseline period). Between April 1, 2018, and October 15, 2019, PVCs were replaced if clinically indicated (intervention period). From October 16, 2019, PVCs were again routinely replaced every 96 hours (reversion period). Main Outcomes and Measures: The PVC-BSI rates and PVC-BSI incidence rate ratios (IRRs) during each period. Results: A total of 412 631 PVCs with documented catheter duration were included (164 331 patients; median [interquartile range] patient age, 51 [33-72] years; 88 928 [54.1%] female): 241 432 PVCs at baseline, 130 779 at intervention, and 40 420 at reversion. Eleven PVC-BSIs were observed during the baseline period, 46 during the intervention, and 4 during the reversion period. Although the monthly number of PVC-days remained stable during all study periods, the number of monthly inserted PVCs decreased during the intervention period. The number of PVCs still in place more than 4 or more than 7 days was higher during the intervention period compared with the baseline and reversion periods. A significantly increased IRR of PVC-BSIs was observed for the intervention period (IRR, 7.20; 95% CI, 3.65-14.22; P < .001) compared with baseline, whereas during the reversion period there was no significant increase (IRR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.30 6.17; P = .69). Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this cohort study using a large, prospective surveillance database suggest that replacement of PVCs only when clinically indicated may be associated with an increased risk of PVC-BSI compared with routine replacement. Even if PVC-associated BSI is a rare event, the use of PVCs in most patients makes this outcome relevant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.