ArticleActa neurologica Belgica2022
Communicating the diagnosis: a survey of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and their families in Japan.
Article in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Methods for informing people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease of their diagnosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Dilemma in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and expectations from brain-machine interfaces.Annals of medicine · 2024Article
- Factors affecting do-not-resuscitate decisions among patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in Taiwan.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the needs of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and their families when being communicated the diagnosis.
methodsWe held a nationwide webinar in September 2020, titled "ALS Café", and distributed a self-report questionnaire to participants. PATIENTS: This cross-sectional study included 56 respondents (patients, n = 32; family members, n = 24).
resultsOf the 56 respondents, 47 (84%) reported being anxious when they were communicated their diagnosis. The average time allocated for communicating the diagnosis was 36.3 ± 25.6 min, and 30% of respondents believed that insufficient time was allocated. Nearly half of the respondents were communicated their diagnosis by one physician, and 57% of the respondents received their diagnosis in one session. Approximately 80% of respondents received information about ventilators when they were being communicated their diagnosis, but most patients did not want to receive this information at that time. The anxious group tended to answer that the time to communicate the diagnosis was short. Meanwhile, all respondents in the mildly anxious group were provided with one or more information about the supportive contents along with the diagnosis. Moreover, in Japan, many patients with ALS and their families desire the legalization of euthanasia, which might affect decision-making.
conclusionsThis study shows that a longer amount of time spent communicating the diagnosis and provision of descriptions needed by patients and their families are important. This can help clinicians understand what the patient requires while being communicated their diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34532828What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.