Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34532619›Full record

ReviewJBMR plus2021

New Insights Into Osteoclast Biology.

Michelle Maree McDonald, Albert Sungsoo Kim, Bridie S Mulholland, Martina Rauner

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JBMR plus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The osteoclast intracellular environment fosters bacterial growth duringbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Developmental Pathways of Immature CD11cInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Accelerated Bone Healing via Electrical Stimulation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. The ontogeny of synovial tissue macrophages.Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Beyond resorption: osteoclasts as drivers of bone formation.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Michelle Maree McDonaldBone Biology Program, Healthy Ageing Theme Garvan Institute of Medical Research Sydney NSW Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3928-2506
Albert Sungsoo KimBone Biology Program, Healthy Ageing Theme Garvan Institute of Medical Research Sydney NSW Australia.
Bridie S MulhollandSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences Griffith University Gold Coast QLD Australia.
Martina RaunerDepartment of Medicine III Medical Faculty of the Technische Universität Dresden Dresden Germany.
Garvan Institute of Medical Research · AUGriffith University · AUTechnische Universität Dresden · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoclasts are multinucleated cells that are characterized by their unique ability to resorb large quantities of bone. Therefore, they are frequently the target of therapeutic interventions to ameliorate bone loss. In an adult organism, osteoclasts derive from hematopoietic stem cells and differentiate into osteoclasts within a multistep process under the influence of macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) and receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL). Historically, the osteoclast life cycle has been defined as linear, whereby lineage-committed mononuclear precursors fuse to generate multinucleated highly specialized and localized bone phagocytic cells, which then undergo apoptosis within weeks. Recent advances through lineage tracing, single cell RNA sequencing, parabiosis, and intravital imaging approaches have challenged this dogma, revealing they have greater longevity and the capacity to circulate and undergo cell recycling. Indeed, these new insights highlight that under homeostatic conditions very few incidences of osteoclast apoptosis occur. More importantly, as we revisit the formation and fate of the osteoclast, novel methods to target osteoclast biology in bone pathology and regeneration are emerging. This review briefly summarizes the historical life cycle of osteoclasts and highlights recent discoveries made through advanced methodologies, which have led to a paradigm shift in osteoclast biology. These findings are discussed in light of both existing and emerging bone targeted therapeutics, bone pathologies, and communication between osteoclasts and cells resident in bone or at distant sites. © 2021 The Authors.

Indexed as

ANTIRESORPTIVESBONE MODELING AND REMODELINGCELLS OF BONEDISEASES AND DISORDERS OF/RELATED TO BONEMOLECULAR PATHWAYS ‐ REMODELINGOSTEOCLASTSOSTEOPETROSISOSTEOPOROSISTHERAPEUTICS

Identifiers

PMID34532619
PMCPMC8441501
OpenAlexW3193767775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.