ArticlePrinciples and practice of clinical research (2015)2021
Addressing the critical role of gender identity and sex in the planning, analysis, and conduct of clinical trials.
Article in Principles and practice of clinical research (2015), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Alzheimer disease seen through the lens of sex and gender.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2025Review
- Participant Diversity in Stroke-Related Medical Device Trials: Historical Context and Ongoing Challenges.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Review
- Review of the Influences of Sex Differences on Health and Disease: What Is the Role of Journals?The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume · 2024Review
- Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Consequences of Hypertension, Obesity, and Diabetes: JACC Focus Seminar 4/7.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2022Review
- Epigenetic modifier Kdm6a/Utx controls the specification of hypothalamic neuronal subtypes in a sex-dependent manner.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
- The role of biological sex in neurophysiological associations of patients with chronic osteoarthritis pain: a prospective cross-sectional study.Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.