ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021
Long-term chest CT follow-up in COVID-19 Survivors: 102-361 days after onset.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence, risk factors and treatments for post-COVID-19 breathlessness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022Pooled it
- Prevalence of post-acute COVID-19 syndrome symptoms at different follow-up periods: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2022Pooled it
- Functional alterations due to post-COVID-19 lung lesions - lessons from a multicenter V/Q SPECT/CT based registry.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Exploring the prevalence and chest CT predictors of Long COVID in children: a comprehensive study from Shanghai and Linyi.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Chest CT features and functional correlates of COVID-19 at 3 months and 12 months follow-up.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2023Article
- Systematic Review of the Prevalence of Long COVID.Open forum infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Clinicopathological Outlines of Post-COVID-19 Pulmonary Fibrosis Compared with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- A Systematic Review of Chest Imaging Findings in Long COVID Patients.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Severe COVID-19 pneumonia leads to post-COVID-19 lung abnormalities on follow-up CT scans.European journal of radiology open · 2023Article
- Predictors for COVID-19 Complete Remission with HRCT Pattern Evolution: A Monocentric, Prospective Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Erratum to long-term chest CT follow-up in COVID-19 Survivors: 102-361 days after onset.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- The Short- and Long-Term Clinical, Radiological and Functional Consequences of COVID-19.Archivos de bronconeumologia · 2022Review
- Case Report: Pirfenidone in the Treatment of Post-COVID-19 Pulmonary Fibrosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate long-term longitudinal changes in chest computed tomography (CT) findings in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) survivors and their correlations with dyspnea after discharge.
methodsA total of 337 COVID-19 survivors who underwent CT scan during hospitalization and between 102 and 361 days after onset were retrospectively included. Subjective CT findings, lesion volume, therapeutic measures and laboratory parameters were collected. The severity of the survivors' dyspnea was determined by follow-up questionnaire. The evolution of the CT findings from the peak period to discharge and throughout follow-up and the abilities of CT findings and clinical parameters to predict survival with and without dyspnea were analyzed.
resultsNinety-one COVID-19 survivors still had dyspnea at follow-up. The age, comorbidity score, duration of hospital stays, receipt of hormone administration, receipt of immunoglobulin injections, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, receipt of mechanical ventilation, laboratory parameters, clinical classifications and parameters associated with lesion volume of the survivors with dyspnea were significantly different from those of survivors without dyspnea. Among the clinical parameters and CT parameters used to identify dyspnea, parameters associated with lesion volume showed the largest area under the curve (AUC) values, with lesion volume at discharge showing the largest AUC (0.820). Lesion volume decreased gradually from the peak period to discharge and through follow-up, with a notable decrease observed after discharge. Absorption of lesions continued 6 months after discharge.
conclusionsAmong the clinical parameters and subjective CT findings, CT findings associated with lesion volume were the best predictors of post-discharge dyspnea in COVID-19 survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.