ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021
Identification of diagnostic and prognostic signatures derived from preoperative blood parameters for oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognosing post-treatment outcomes of head and neck cancer using structured data and machine learning: A systematic review.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- In Silico Analysis of Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe aimed to develop novel diagnostic and prognostic signatures based on preoperative inflammatory, immunological, and nutritional parameters in blood (PIINPBs) by machine learning algorithms for patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).
methodsA total of 486 OSCC patients and 200 age and gender-matched non-OSCC patients who were diagnosed and treated at our institution for noninfectious, nontumor diseases were retrospectively enrolled and divided into training and validation cohorts. Based on PIINPB, 6 machine learning classifiers including random forest, support vector machine, extreme gradient boosting, naive Bayes, neural network, and logistic regression were used to derive diagnostic models, while least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analyses were employed to construct prognostic signatures. A novel prognostic nomogram integrating a PIINPB-derived prognostic signature and selected clinicopathological parameters was further developed. Performances of these signatures were assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibrating curves, and decision tree.
resultsDiagnostic models developed by machine learning algorithms from 13 PIINPBs, which included counts of white blood cells (WBC), neutrophils (N), monocytes (M), lymphocytes (L), platelets (P), albumin (ALB), and hemoglobin (Hb), along with albumin-globulin ratio (A/G), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI), displayed satisfactory discriminating capabilities in patients with or without OSCC, and among OSCC patients with diverse pathological grades and clinical stages. A prognostic signature based on 6 survival-associated PIINPBs (L, P, PNI, LMR, SII, A/G) served as an independent factor to predict patient survival. Moreover, a novel nomogram integrating prognostic signature and tumor size, pathological grade, cervical node metastasis, and clinical stage significantly enhanced prognostic power [3-year area under the curve (AUC) =0.825; 5-year AUC =0.845].
conclusionsOur results generated novel and robust diagnostic and prognostic signatures derived from PIINPBs by machine learning for OSCC. Performance of these signatures suggest the potential for PIINPBs to supplement current regimens and provide better patient stratification and prognostic prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.