Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34532232›Full record

ArticleMalariaWorld journal2017

Eave tubes for malaria control in Africa: Videographic observations of mosquito behaviour in Tanzania with a simple and rugged video surveillance system.

Sergej Sperling, Michael Cordel, Scott Gordon, Bart G J Knols, Andreas Rose

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MalariaWorld journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05736679 (EaveTubes for Control of Vector Borne Diseases in Côte d'Ivoire), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05736679 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

EaveTubes for Control of Vector Borne Diseases in Côte d'Ivoire

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Notre DameRan2023 to 2025Enrolled1,870ConditionsMalariaArmsIn2Care EaveTube
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sergej SperlingBiogents AG, Weißenburgstraße 22, 93055 Regensburg, Germany.
Michael CordelBiogents AG, Weißenburgstraße 22, 93055 Regensburg, Germany.
Scott GordonBiogents AG, Weißenburgstraße 22, 93055 Regensburg, Germany.
Bart G J KnolsRadboud University Nijmegen, Department of Environmental Science, Heyendaalseweg 135, 6525 AJ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Andreas RoseBiogents AG, Weißenburgstraße 22, 93055 Regensburg, Germany.
University of Regensburg · DERadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEave tubes are novel mosquito control devices that help to protect households against malaria vectors and other mosquitoes. They are installed in the upper walls of human habitations after the eaves have been closed. Mosquitoes trying to enter through these tubes are intercepted by electrostatic netting that can be treated with a variety of insecticides. Using video, mosquito behaviour and duration of contact with netting in eave tubes was recorded and analysed to assess contamination with insecticides under semi-field and field conditions. MATERIALS AND

methodsOff-the-shelf action cameras were used to observe behaviour of mosquitoes in eave tubes near Ifakara, Tanzania. In an experimental hut in a screen house, we observed

resultsIn the semi-field setup, the median contact time of

conclusionsWe have found no indication that the behaviour of mosquitoes on electrostatic eave tube netting, treated either with bendiocarb powder or with

Identifiers

PMID34532232
PMCPMC8415065
OpenAlexW2764079937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.