Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34532132›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2021

Comparison of initial tumor responses to transarterial bland embolization and drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity-score matching analysis.

Jianxi Guo, Weidong Wang, Yanfang Zhang, Linfeng Xu, Jian Kong

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jianxi GuoDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University, First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, China.
Weidong WangDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yanfang ZhangDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University, First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, China.
Linfeng XuDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jian KongDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University, First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, China.
Southern University of Science and Technology · CNJinan University · CNSun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransarterial bland embolization (TABE) is widely used to treat the spontaneous rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and can lead to ischemic necrosis of the tumor. In this study, we used the propensity-score matching (PSM) method to compare the initial responses of treatment-naïve HCC patients to TABE and drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE), and the safety of these treatments.

methodsPatients with treatment-naïve HCC, who had been admitted to 2 medical centers from January 2016 to December 2020, were enrolled as the research subjects. The data of 26 patients treated with TABE for ruptured HCC and 52 patients treated with DEB-TACE for primary HCC were collected according to our inclusion and exclusion criteria, and a PSM analysis was conducted to assess the safety and effectiveness of these two interventional techniques 1 month postoperatively.

resultsIn relation to ruptured HCC, TABE had a hemostatic success rate of 97.0%. Before PSM, the TABE group had a larger maximum tumor diameter (P<0.05), a higher proportion of multiple tumors (P<0.05), a higher proportion of Child-Pugh class B (P<0.05), and a higher proportion of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B (P<0.05) than the DEB-TACE group. After PSM, the baseline characteristics of these two groups were well balanced, and there was no significant difference in patients' initial therapeutic responses and tumor recurrence rates (both P>0.05). The multivariate regression analysis showed that tumor size was an independent predictor of the objective response rate (ORR) [odds ratio (OR): 3.312; 95% CI: 0.152-5.944; P<0.05]. Tumor number and BCLC stage also affected ORR; however, ORR was not significantly correlated with the interventional technique (TABE

conclusionsTABE is highly effective at managing hemorrhage from ruptured HCC. The initial therapeutic response of HCC to TABE is similar to that to DEB-TACE; however, TABE is associated with lower hepatotoxicity and fewer adverse effects, which paves the way for subsequent treatments and systemic therapies.

Indexed as

drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE)Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)initial responsepropensity-score matching (PSM)transarterial bland embolization (TABE)

Identifiers

PMID34532132
PMCPMC8421872
OpenAlexW3187184465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.