Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34532125›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2021

Proton stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastases-results of 5-year experience for 81 hepatic lesions.

Alex R Coffman, Daniel C Sufficool, Joseph I Kang, Chung-Tsen Hsueh, Sasha Swenson, Patrick Q McGee, Gayathri Nagaraj, Baldev Patyal, Mark E Reeves, Jerry D Slater and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Do We Have a Winner? Advocating for SBRT in HCC Management.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alex R CoffmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Daniel C SufficoolDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kettering Health Network, Kettering, OH, USA.
Joseph I KangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Chung-Tsen HsuehDepartment of Medical Oncology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Sasha SwensonLoma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Patrick Q McGeeLoma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Gayathri NagarajDepartment of Medical Oncology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Baldev PatyalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Mark E ReevesDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Jerry D SlaterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Gary Y YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Loma Linda University · USLoma Linda University Medical Center · USHealth Net · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo report on our institutional experience using Proton stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for patients with liver metastases.

methodsAll patients with liver metastases treated with Proton SBRT between September 2012 and December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method calculated from the time of completion of Proton SBRT. LC was defined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines (version 1.1). Toxicity was graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.

resultsForty-six patients with 81 lesions were treated with Proton SBRT. The median age was 65.5 years old (range, 33-86 years) and the median follow up was 15 months (range, 1-54 months). The median size of the gross tumor volume (GTV) was 2.5 cm (range, 0.7-8.9 cm). Two or more lesions were treated in 56.5% of patients, with one patient receiving treatment to a total of five lesions. There were 37 lesions treated with a biologically effective dose (BED) ≤60, 9 lesions with a BED of 61-80, 22 lesions with a BED of 81-100, and 13 lesions with a BED >100. The 1-year and 2-year LC for all lesions was 92.5% (95% CI, 82.7% to 96.8%). The grade 1 and grade 2 toxicity rates were 37% and 6.5%, respectively. There were no grade 3 or higher toxicities and no cases of radiation-induced liver disease (RILD).

conclusionsProton SBRT for the treatment of liver metastases has promising LC rates with the ability to safely treat multiple liver metastases. Accrual continues for our phase II trial treating liver metastases with Proton SBRT to 60 GyE (Gray equivalent) in 3 fractions.

Indexed as

Liver metastasesproton therapystereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)

Identifiers

PMID34532125
PMCPMC8421917
OpenAlexW3152805456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.