ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2021
Magnetic resonance elastography can predict the development of hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Research advances of magnetic resonance elastography for assessing the bioinvasiveness in hepatocellular carcinoma].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026Review
- Preoperative Multifrequency MR Elastography for Stratifying Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway and Microvascular Invasion Phenotypes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Article
- [Application and prospects of magnetic resonance imaging techniques in the diagnosis and evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2024Review
- Commentary: "Magnetic resonance elastography can predict the development of hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis and systematic review".Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has become the third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, and its incidence rate is increasing. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) can indirectly realize the accurate non-invasive evaluation of liver reserve function in HCC patients. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of MRE in the diagnosis of HCC patients.
methodsWe searched globally-recognized electronic databases, such as PubMed, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Cochrane Central, for relevant literature on MRE prediction of HCC. The diagnostic performance of all studies was quantitatively summarized using a bivariate random effects model including heterogeneity analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and bias determination.
resultsThe diagnostic accuracy of MRE for HCC was based on 1,735 patients. The sensitivity (31-100%) was lower than the specificity (81-94%). The overall sensitivity was 64% [95% confidence interval (CI): 46-79%; I DISCUSSION: The results of our meta-analysis show that MRE has moderate sensitivity and excellent specificity in the detection of HCC. MRE can be an effective diagnostic tool for HCC and can provide strong support for the selection of clinical treatment methods and prognostic judgment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.