Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34532063›Full record

ArticleVirus evolution2021

A genome-wide association study identifies

Anamarija Butković, Rubén González, Mark Paul Selda Rivarez, Santiago F Elena

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virus evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. ACS omega · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Genetic basis ofeLife · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Host developmental stages shape the evolution of a plant RNA virus.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anamarija ButkovićInstituto de Biología Integrativa de Sistemas (I2SysBio), CSIC-Universitat de València, Catedrático Agustín Escardino 9, Paterna, València 46980, Spain.
Rubén GonzálezInstituto de Biología Integrativa de Sistemas (I2SysBio), CSIC-Universitat de València, Catedrático Agustín Escardino 9, Paterna, València 46980, Spain.
Mark Paul Selda RivarezInstituto de Biología Integrativa de Sistemas (I2SysBio), CSIC-Universitat de València, Catedrático Agustín Escardino 9, Paterna, València 46980, Spain.
Santiago F ElenaInstituto de Biología Integrativa de Sistemas (I2SysBio), CSIC-Universitat de València, Catedrático Agustín Escardino 9, Paterna, València 46980, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Viruses lie in a continuum between generalism and specialism depending on their ability to infect more or less hosts. While generalists are able to successfully infect a wide variety of hosts, specialists are limited to one or a few. Even though generalists seem to gain an advantage due to their wide host range, they usually pay a pleiotropic fitness cost within each host. On the contrary, a specialist has maximal fitness within its own host. A relevant yet poorly explored question is whether viruses differ in the way they interact with their hosts' gene expression depending on their degree of specialization. Using a genome-wide association study approach, we have identified host genes whose expression depends on whether hosts were infected with more or less specialized viral strains. Four hundred fifty natural accessions of

Indexed as

emerging virusesGWAShost-rangePotyvirusspecialism-generalism continuumvirus evolutionvirus-host interactions

Identifiers

PMID34532063
PMCPMC8438913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.