ReviewFood science & nutrition2021
Should we still worry about the safety of GMO foods? Why and why not? A review.
Review in Food science & nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Public perception of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Montenegro: insight for sustainable biotechnology and policy development.GM crops & food · 2026Article
- Genetically modified foods and human health: a comprehensive review and cross-national time-trend analysis.GM crops & food · 2026Review
- Public knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions toward genetically modified foods in Lebanon.GM crops & food · 2025Article
- Growth and development of two predator species fed a diet of genetically engineered mosquitoes.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- Future perspectives of GMO detection in agriculture: strategies for electrochemical nucleic acid detection.Mikrochimica acta · 2025Review
- Evaluating Consumer Perceptions and Safety of Genetically Modified Foods in Africa: A Comprehensive Review.Food science & nutrition · 2025Review
- Impact of genetically modified organisms on meat quality.Open veterinary journal · 2025Review
- Rethinking progress: harmonizing the discourse on genetically modified crops.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Melica as an emerging model system for comparative studies in temperate Pooideae grasses.Annals of botany · 2023Article
- Review
- Plant breeding advancements with "CRISPR-Cas" genome editing technologies will assist future food security.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- Using MRI to Study High Pressure Assisted Nutrient Infusion.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Review
- Article
- Genetically engineered crops for sustainably enhanced food production systems.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Should we still worry about the safety of GMO foods? Why and why not? A review.Food science & nutrition · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Global population is increasing at an alarming rate, posing a threat on the supplies of basic needs and services. However, population increase does not seem to be a common agendum of the global scientists and political leaders. People in the developed countries are more concerned about new technologies and their products. Pseudo-threats related to the uncertainties of genetic engineering of crops and their outputs present on consumers are more audible and controversial than the real difficulties the world is experiencing at the moment and in the future. This review presents brief summaries of the real reasons to worry about and the uncertainties about genetically modified organisms. This article also presents the real uncertainties shared by consumers and scientists with respect to the past, present, and future of genetically engineered organisms. Developments in the field of precision genetics in the recent years and the implications on regulatory, breeding, and socio-cultural dimensions of the global settings are included.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.