ArticlePhilosophy compass2021
Neurotechnology ethics and relational agency.
Article in Philosophy compass, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ethics of brain-computer interface in mental healthcare.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Article
- Conflicting Interests and New Frontiers: A Role for Virtue Ethics in Cutting Edge Brain Research with Humans.Neuroethics · 2025Article
- Review
- Brain Pioneers and Moral Entanglement: An Argument for Post-trial Responsibilities in Neural-Device Trials.The Hastings Center report · 2024Article
- Ethics and Governance of Neurotechnology in Africa: Lessons From AI.JMIR neurotechnology · 2024Article
- Development of Korea Neuroethics Guidelines.Journal of Korean medical science · 2023Article
- Weak transhumanism: moderate enhancement as a non-radical path to radical enhancement.Theoretical medicine and bioethics · 2023Article
- Recommendations for promoting user agency in the design of speech neuroprostheses.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- Participant Engagement, Epistemic Injustice, and Early-Phase Implanted Neural Device Research.The Hastings Center reportArticle
- Neurotechnology through the lens of users and as a novel field for society.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Novel neurotechnologies, like deep brain stimulation and brain-computer interface, offer great hope for treating, curing, and preventing disease, but raise important questions about effects these devices may have on human identity, authenticity, and autonomy. After briefly assessing recent narrative work in these areas, we show that
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.