Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34531914›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of otolaryngology2021

Prognostic Significance of a Scoring System Combining p16, Smoking, and Drinking Status in a Series of 131 Patients with Oropharyngeal Cancers.

Cyril Bouland, Didier Dequanter, Jérôme R Lechien, Charlotte Hanssens, Nicolas De Saint Aubain, Antoine Digonnet, Rokneddine Javadian, Antoine Yanni, Alexandra Rodriguez, Isabelle Loeb and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of otolaryngology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cyril BoulandDepartment of Stomatology-Maxillofacial Surgery, CHU Saint Pierre, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Didier DequanterDepartment of Stomatology-Maxillofacial Surgery, CHU Saint Pierre, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2420-285X
Jérôme R LechienDepartment of Otolaryngolology-Head & Neck Surgery, CHU Saint Pierre, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Charlotte HanssensDepartment of Stomatology-Maxillofacial Surgery, CHU Saint Pierre, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Nicolas De Saint AubainDepartment of Pathology, Jules Bordet Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Antoine DigonnetDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Jules Bordet Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Rokneddine JavadianDepartment of Stomatology-Maxillofacial Surgery, CHU Saint Pierre, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Antoine YanniDepartment of Stomatology-Maxillofacial Surgery, CHU Saint Pierre, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Alexandra RodriguezDepartment of Otolaryngolology-Head & Neck Surgery, CHU Saint Pierre, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Isabelle LoebDepartment of Stomatology-Maxillofacial Surgery, CHU Saint Pierre, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Fabrice JourneLaboratory of Human Anatomy and Experimental Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMONS), Mons, Belgium.
Sven SaussezDepartment of Otolaryngolology-Head & Neck Surgery, CHU Saint Pierre, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversity of Mons · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTobacco and alcohol are two main risk factors associated with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Studies showed that human papillomavirus (HPV) plays a role in the etiology of this cancer. HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients present in general a better response to conventional therapy and better overall survival (OS). However, OSCC is a heterogeneous disease regarding treatment. This study aimed to identify more effective prognostic factors associated with a poor clinical outcome for OSCC patients to improve treatment selection. MATERIALS AND

methodsOSCC patients diagnosed between 2007 and 2017, in two Belgian hospitals, were included. Demographic and clinicopathologic data were extracted from medical records. HPV status was determined through p16 immunohistochemistry. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analyses allowed to identify variables prognostic for OS and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Kaplan-Meier survival curves have been assessed for survival.

resultsThe study included 131 patients. Statistics showed that monotherapies were significantly associated with a shorter OS; p16 overexpression was significantly associated with a weak consumption of tobacco or alcohol, and a high p16 expression was significantly associated with both longer RFS and OS. The study validated that tobacco and alcohol consumption were significantly correlated with poorer RFS and poorer OS. Only p16 expression trended to be significant for RFS when compared to smoking and drinking habits, while p16 upregulation and alcohol use were both vital for OS indicating that p16 is an independent and significant prognostic factor in OSCC patients. Finally, a scoring system combining p16, tobacco, and alcohol status was defined and was significantly associated with longer RFS and longer OS for nonsmoker and nondrinker p16-positive OSCC patients.

conclusionsThis study confirmed that the overexpression of the p16 protein could be viewed as a factor of good prognosis for RFS and OS of OSCC patients. The prognostic significance of a scoring system combining p16 expression, smoking, and drinking status was evaluated and concluded to be a more effective tool to determine therapeutic orientations based on the risk factors for better treatment relevance and survival.

Identifiers

PMID34531914
PMCPMC8440106
OpenAlexW3197426493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.