Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34531876›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2021

Comparison of Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation From Extremely Low Body Weight ≤5kg

Jiawei Peng, Helong Dai, Hedong Zhang, Shaojie Yu, Xubiao Xie, Fenghua Peng, Gongbin Lan, Shanbiao Hu, Yu Wang, Xiaotian Tang and 13 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Clinical surveillance of split renal function inQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Short-term outcome of kidney transplantation from deceased donors with nephrolithiasis.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Donor Size Doesn't ImpactTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Jiawei PengDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Helong DaiDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Hedong ZhangDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Shaojie YuDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xubiao XieDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Fenghua PengDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Gongbin LanDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Shanbiao HuDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yu WangDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xiaotian TangDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yong GuoDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Chen GaoDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Chunhua FangDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Manhua NieDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xiaoqiong YuanDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Mingda ZhongDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Zhouqi TangDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Tengfang LiDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Siyu SunDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Hengchang YaoDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Jianfei HouDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Ruixue HuangDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Longkai PengDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Kidney transplantation from donors who weigh ≤5 kg is performed at only a few transplant centers owing to the high complication and low graft survival rates associated with this approach. Methods: We retrospectively compared the results of kidney transplantation at our center between January 2015 and December 2019 based on the following pediatric donor criteria: donor body weight ≤5 kg (n=32), 5 kg< donor weight ≤20 kg (n=143), and donor weight >20 kg (n=110). We also perform subgroup analysis of kidney transplantation outcomes from ≤5 kg donors, using conventional (dual separate and classic en-bloc KTx)/novel (en-bloc KTx with outflow tract) surgical methods and allocating to adult/pediatric recipients. Results: The death-censored graft survival rates from extremely low body weight ≤5kg at 1 month, and 1, 3, and 5 years were 90.6%, 80.9%, 77.5%, and 73.9%, respectively, which were significantly lower than that from larger body weight pediatric donors. However, the 3-, and 5-year post-transplantation eGFRs were not significantly different between the pediatric and adult recipient group. The thrombosis (18.8%) and urinary leakage (18.8%) rates were significantly higher in the donor weight ≤5 kg group. Compared with 5 kg< donor weight ≤20 kg group, donor weight ≤5kg group was at elevated risk of graft loss due to thrombosis (OR: 13.4) and acute rejection (OR: 6.7). No significant difference on the outcomes of extremely low body weight donor kidney transplantation was observed between adults and pediatric recipients. Urinary leakage rate is significantly lower in the novel operation (8.7%) than in the conventional operation group (44.4%). Conclusions: Although the outcomes of donor body weight ≤5kg kidney transplantation is inferior to that from donors with large body weight, it can be improved through technical improvement. Donors with body weight ≤5 kg can be considered as an useful source to expand the donor pool.

Indexed as

Body WeightDonor SelectionTissue DonorsAdolescentAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGraft RejectionGraft SurvivalHumansInfantInfant, NewbornKidney TransplantationMalePostoperative Complicationscenter experienceextremely low body weightgraft survivalkidney transplantationpediatric donorutilization

Identifiers

PMID34531876
PMCPMC8438242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.