ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2021
Current Methods, Common Practices, and Perspectives in Tracking and Monitoring Bioinoculants in Soil.
Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Specific monitoring of viable plant growth-promoting Bacillus velezensis PH-023 in the rhizosphere of tomato.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Microbial consortia and drought tolerance- A paradigm shift towards agro-ecological sustainability.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
- Rapid detection of probiotics in aquaculture using a fluorescent ligand sensor based on a Zr-MOF@Methylene blue composite.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Article
- Decoding the rhizosphere microbiome againstFrontiers in microbiomes · 2026Review
- MOF-818 nanozyme-based biosensor for specific point-of-care testing of Bacillus subtilis in complex agricultural soil.Mikrochimica acta · 2025Article
- Recent Advances in Bioinoculant Formulations and Their Shelf-Life: A Review.Current microbiology · 2025Review
- Rhizobacteria from vineyard and commercial arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi induce synergistic microbiome shifts within grapevine root systems.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Native Fungi as a Nature-Based Solution to Mitigate Toxic Metal(loid) Accumulation in Rice.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Biotransformation of As, Cr, Hg, and Mn by Pseudomonadota: chances and risks.Biodegradation · 2025Review
- Plant Microbiomes Alleviate Abiotic Stress-Associated Damage in Crops and Enhance Climate-Resilient Agriculture.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Design and regulation of engineered bacteria for environmental release.Nature microbiology · 2025Review
- Non-native PGPB consortium consisting of Pseudomonas sp. G31 and Azotobacter sp. PBC2 promoted winter wheat growth and slightly altered the native bacterial community.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Bacterial osmoprotectants-a way to survive in saline conditions and potential crop allies.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2025Review
- Microbial Inoculants in Sustainable Agriculture: Advancements, Challenges, and Future Directions.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Non-native PGPB Consortium Altered the Rhizobacterial Community and Slightly Stimulated the Growth of Winter Oilseed Rape (Brassica napus L.) Under Field Conditions.Microbial ecology · 2025Article
- Postbiotic metabolites present in the supernatants ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Comparative genomics reveal unique markers to monitor by routine PCR assay bioinoculant ofIndian journal of microbiology · 2024Article
- Toward Ecologically Relevant Genetics of Interactions Between Host Plants and Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria.Advanced genetics (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Article
- DNA stable isotope probing reveals the impact of trophic interactions on bioaugmentation of soils with different pollution histories.Microbiome · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microorganisms promised to lead the bio-based revolution for a more sustainable agriculture. Beneficial microorganisms could be a valid alternative to the use of chemical fertilizers or pesticides. However, the increasing use of microbial inoculants is also raising several questions about their efficacy and their effects on the autochthonous soil microorganisms. There are two major issues on the application of bioinoculants to soil: (i) their detection in soil, and the analysis of their persistence and fate; (ii) the monitoring of the impact of the introduced bioinoculant on native soil microbial communities. This review explores the strategies and methods that can be applied to the detection of microbial inoculants and to soil monitoring. The discussion includes a comprehensive critical assessment of the available tools, based on morpho-phenological, molecular, and microscopic analyses. The prospects for future development of protocols for regulatory or commercial purposes are also discussed, underlining the need for a multi-method (polyphasic) approach to ensure the necessary level of discrimination required to track and monitor bioinoculants in soil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.