ReviewFrontiers in physiology2021
Neurohumoral Cardiac Regulation: Optogenetics Gets Into the Groove.
Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular pathways linking traumatic brain injury to cardiovascular dysfunction: therapeutic potential of physical exercise.Metabolic brain disease · 2026Review
- The brain-heart axis: integrative cooperation of neural, mechanical and biochemical pathways.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2025Review
- Role of Cav1.3 Channels in Brain-Heart Interactions: An Unexpected Journey.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Emerging optogenetics technologies in biomedical applications.Smart medicine · 2023Review
- Cholinergic collaterals arising from noradrenergic sympathetic neurons in mice.The Journal of physiology · 2023Article
- Controls of Central and Peripheral Blood Pressure and Hemorrhagic/Hypovolemic Shock.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Sodium Intake and Disease: Another Relationship to Consider.Nutrients · 2023Review
- Sympathetic neuropathology is revealed in muscles affected by amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Neurotoxic Effect of Doxorubicin Treatment on Cardiac Sympathetic Neurons.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Nerve growth factor transfer from cardiomyocytes to innervating sympathetic neurons activates TrkA receptors at the neuro-cardiac junction.The Journal of physiology · 2022Article
- What gets on the nerves of cardiac patients? Pathophysiological changes in cardiac innervation.The Journal of physiology · 2022Article
- Tuning the Consonance of Microscopic Neuro-Cardiac Interactions Allows the Heart Beats to Play Countless Genres.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Review
- Untangling Peripheral Sympathetic Neurocircuits.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Failing Heart Transplants and Rejection-A Cellular Perspective.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2021Review
- Chemokine-like Receptor 1 in Brain of Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats Mediates Systemic Hypertension.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The cardiac autonomic nervous system (ANS) is the main modulator of heart function, adapting contraction force, and rate to the continuous variations of intrinsic and extrinsic environmental conditions. While the parasympathetic branch dominates during rest-and-digest sympathetic neuron (SN) activation ensures the rapid, efficient, and repeatable increase of heart performance, e.g., during the "fight-or-flight response." Although the key role of the nervous system in cardiac homeostasis was evident to the eyes of physiologists and cardiologists, the degree of cardiac innervation, and the complexity of its circuits has remained underestimated for too long. In addition, the mechanisms allowing elevated efficiency and precision of neurogenic control of heart function have somehow lingered in the dark. This can be ascribed to the absence of methods adequate to study complex cardiac electric circuits in the unceasingly moving heart. An increasing number of studies adds to the scenario the evidence of an intracardiac neuron system, which, together with the autonomic components, define a little brain inside the heart, in fervent dialogue with the central nervous system (CNS). The advent of optogenetics, allowing control the activity of excitable cells with cell specificity, spatial selectivity, and temporal resolution, has allowed to shed light on basic neuro-cardiology. This review describes how optogenetics, which has extensively been used to interrogate the circuits of the CNS, has been applied to untangle the knots of heart innervation, unveiling the cellular mechanisms of neurogenic control of heart function, in physiology and pathology, as well as those participating to brain-heart communication, back and forth. We discuss existing literature, providing a comprehensive view of the advancement in the understanding of the mechanisms of neurogenic heart control. In addition, we weigh the limits and potential of optogenetics in basic and applied research in neuro-cardiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.