Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34531090›Full record

ArticleJournal of Ayurveda and integrative medicine

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a standardized Curcuma longa Linn formulation in cervical cancer.

P H Paradkar, A S Juvekar, M S Barkume, A J Amonkar, J V Joshi, G Soman, A D B Vaidya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Ayurveda and integrative medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

P H ParadkarKasturba Health Society- Medical Research Center, Vile Parle West, Mumbai, India. Electronic address: prajakta.hsp@gmail.com.
A S JuvekarAnticancer Drug Screening Facility, ACTREC, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India.
M S BarkumeAnticancer Drug Screening Facility, ACTREC, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India.
A J AmonkarKasturba Health Society- Medical Research Center, Vile Parle West, Mumbai, India.
J V JoshiKasturba Health Society- Medical Research Center, Vile Parle West, Mumbai, India.
G SomanNisarga Biotech Pvt Ltd., Satara, India.
A D B VaidyaKasturba Health Society- Medical Research Center, Vile Parle West, Mumbai, India.
Kasturba Hospital · INAdvanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer · INBiotech Park · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe anti-cancer activity of phytomolecules present in turmeric or haridra (Curcuma longa Linn) extracts against cancer has been described in various 'in vitro and in vivo' studies.

objectiveIn the present study, in vitro and in vivo anti-cancer and chemo-preventive activity of a new standardized Supercritical Turmeric Oil Extract (SCTOE) NBFR-03 was evaluated in cervical cancer models. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In vitro cytotoxicity of this formulation was assessed at 10, 20, 40, and 80 μg/ml concentrations, in three cervical cancer cell lines (HeLa, SiHa, ME180) using Sulforhodamine B assay. The in vivo anti-cancer activity was evaluated in two groups of female nude mice; the first one was with tumor xenograft implants and at the same time treatment was started with 96 μl/kg/day p.o. and 192 μl/kg/day p.o. NBFR-03 for three months. The second group was kept as chemoprevention group where mice were pre-treated with the formulation (96 μl/kg/day p.o.) for two weeks and injected with cancer cell suspension with continued treatment for three months.

resultsNo cytotoxicity was seen in any cell line with the extract when compared to positive control (Adriamycin 10 μg/ml). In mice the first treatment group with tumor xenograft implants did not show any significant anti-tumor activity but showed a trend where higher dose group had smaller tumor volumes as compared to lower dose group and controls (p = 0.37 and p = 0.34 respectively). The chemopreventive group with pre-treated mice also showed smaller tumor size as compared to controls (p = 0.163).

conclusionNBFR-03 turmeric oil extract showed a promising trend in mice pre-treated with NBFR-03. There is a scope for further studying the potential of this extract as complementary therapy and as a chemopreventive.

Indexed as

AnticancerCervical cancerChemopreventionMedicinal plantsPrevention of cervical cancerSupercritical turmeric oil extract

Identifiers

PMID34531090
PMCPMC8642669
OpenAlexW3200040936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.