ArticleGene2019
Cebú, Thailand and Taiwanese aboriginal populations according to Y-STR loci.
Article in Gene, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic mixed diversity landscape in the paternal lineages of 11 populations inhabiting Southwest China according to the analysis of 25 Y-STRs.BMC ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Exploring Y-chromosomal STRs and SNPs for forensic and genetic insights in the Jiangsu Han population.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Delineating the dispersal of Y-chromosome sub-haplogroup O2a2b-P164 among Austronesian-speaking populations.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Genetic characterization of populations in the Marquesas Archipelago in the context of the Austronesian expansion.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- The Ami and Yami aborigines of Taiwan and their genetic relationship to East Asian and Pacific populations.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2021Article
- Insights Into Forensic Features and Genetic Structures of Guangdong Maoming Han Based on 27 Y-STRs.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Here we report for the first time the Y27-STR Yfiler plus profiles of the insular population of Cebú in the central region of the Philippine Archipelago and the general continental population of Thailand, two strategic locations of interest in connection with the Austronesian expansion. Traditionally, the peopling of Taiwan has been envisioned as a single wave of agriculturists migrating from mainland Southeast Asia. Yet, more recent data support a scenario in which a number of migrations from the continent populated the island. Genetic affinity parameters from this study indicate that certain Formosan tribes are genetically closer to geographical distant populations in the Solomon Island than to other nearby Taiwanese tribes. Furthermore, Taiwanese aboriginal populations in this study partition into three clusters, one associated with populations from the Philippines and Thailand, a second one segregating with populations of the Solomon Islands and a third grouping made up exclusively of Taiwanese aboriginal tribes. The populations within each of these three clusters exhibit different degrees of differentiation among them suggesting unique population histories. All together, these differential genetic affinities of specific Taiwanese tribes to groups from different geographical regions and to each other are compatible with multiple origins of the Austronesian expansion from Formosa as well as from mainland Southeast Asia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.