Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34530874›Full record

ArticleItalian journal of pediatrics2021

In-hospital and web-based intervention to counteract vaccine hesitancy in very preterm infants' families: a NICU experience.

Antonio Di Mauro, Federica Di Mauro, Chiara Greco, Orazio Valerio Giannico, Francesca Maria Grosso, Maria Elisabetta Baldassarre, Manuela Capozza, Federico Schettini, Pasquale Stefanizzi, Nicola Laforgia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Antonio Di MauroPediatric Primary Care, National Pediatric Health Care System, Via Conversa 12, Margherita di Savoia, BAT, Italy. dimauroantonio@msn.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7052-9784
Federica Di MauroDepartment of Prevention, Local Health Authority of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Chiara GrecoNeonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Orazio Valerio GiannicoDepartment of Prevention, Local Health Authority of Taranto, Taranto, Italy.
Francesca Maria GrossoPostgraduate School of Public Health, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Maria Elisabetta BaldassarreNeonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Manuela CapozzaNeonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Federico SchettiniNeonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Pasquale StefanizziDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Nicola LaforgiaNeonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
University of Bari Aldo Moro · ITNational Health Care Institute · NLUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaccine hesitancy is a global problem, carrying significant health risks for extremely vulnerable population as that of preterm infants. Social media are emerging as significant tools for public health promotion. Our aim was to evaluate both the coverage and the timeliness of routine immunizations in a cohort of preterm infants (< 33 weeks of gestational age) at 24 months of age whose families have been subjected to in-hospital and web-based interventions to counteract vaccine hesitancy.

methodsFor a period of 2 years parents of preterm infants were instructed during their follow up visits by a member of the NICU team to get correct informations about vaccines from a social network page. Vaccination rates of preterm infants were assessed at 24 months of chronological age with an electronic database and compared to both general population and historical cohort.

resultsCoverage and timeliness of vaccinations at 24 months of age of 170 preterm infants were analyzed in December 2019. Gestational age and birth weight median (IQR) were, respectively, 31.0 (5.0) weeks and 1475.0 (843.8) g. Coverage rates were similar to those of the regional population (p > 0.05), while timeliness of administration was significantly delayed compared to the recommended schedule (p < 0.001). Age of administration was not correlated with either body weight and gestational age at birth (Spearman rank, p > 0.05). DTaP-IPV-HBV-Hib 2nd and 3rd doses, MMR and Varicella vaccines coverage data were higher compared to historical cohort (p < 0.05).

conclusionIncreasing vaccine confidence through web-based interventions could have a positive impact on vaccination acceptance of parents of preterm infants, although timeliness results still delayed. There is a strong need to develop different and effective vaccination strategies to protect this very vulnerable population.

Indexed as

Intensive Care Units, NeonatalInternet-Based InterventionPatient Education as TopicVaccination HesitancyChild, PreschoolFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureItalyPatient Acceptance of Health CareProspective StudiesVaccinationPreterm newbornVaccinationVaccine hesitancyWeb-based intervention

Identifiers

PMID34530874
PMCPMC8447703
OpenAlexW3200532405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.