Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34530833›Full record

SynthesisBMC palliative care2021

Health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer in the palliative phase: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ida Røed Flyum, Seila Mahic, Ellen Karine Grov, Pål Joranger

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC palliative care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06521827 (The Role of Short Course of Palliative Radiation in Metastatic Cancer Rectum), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06521827 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Role of Short Course of Palliative Radiation in Metastatic Cancer Rectum

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled49ConditionsMetastatic Cancer RectumArmsshort course radiotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Quality of life assessment for colorectal cancer follow-up: A latent profile analysis of EORTC measures.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Comparative analysis of osteoporotic versus pathologic fracture in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ida Røed Flyum *Department of Nursing and Health Promotion. Faculty of Health Sciences, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, P.O. Box 4, St. Olavs plass, NO-0130, Oslo, Norway. Ida.r.flyum@ldh.no.
Seila Mahic *Department of Nursing and Health Promotion. Faculty of Health Sciences, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, P.O. Box 4, St. Olavs plass, NO-0130, Oslo, Norway. Seila.Mahic@vid.no.
Ellen Karine GrovDepartment of Nursing and Health Promotion. Faculty of Health Sciences, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, P.O. Box 4, St. Olavs plass, NO-0130, Oslo, Norway.
Pål JorangerDepartment of Nursing and Health Promotion. Faculty of Health Sciences, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, P.O. Box 4, St. Olavs plass, NO-0130, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe occurrence of colorectal cancer has doubled over the last 50 years and many people are living with the disease in the palliative phase. Therefore, it is important that healthcare personnel have knowledge about the patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The aim of this review is to investigate how HRQoL is reported by means of different measures for patients in the palliative phase of colorectal cancer and examine which sociodemographic and clinical factors are associated with the mean scores reported for HRQoL.

methodA systematic review and meta-analysis using forest plots in STATA were conducted. The databases MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Amed, and SveMed+ were used for the systematic searches with combinations of terms for colorectal cancer, the palliative phase and HRQoL. The Cochrane handbook and the PRISMA checklist from 2009 were utilised.

resultsIn total, 710 articles were identified. Eleven quantitative studies met the inclusion criteria and six were included in the meta-analysis. Five of the 11 studies had a longitudinal design, while the other six had a cross-sectional design. The meta-analyzes shows that the average HRQoL in palliative phase was 62.9 (56.8-69.0) 15D was 0.76 (0.73-0.79), EQ-5D was 0.67 (0.62-0.73), and VAS was 64.1 (53.7-74.4). Multiple sociodemographic and clinical variables were associated with HRQoL and a higher prevalence of common cancer symptoms were reported than gastrointestinal symptoms.

conclusionThis systematic review revealed that patients with colorectal cancer report low HRQoL. Furthermore, it shows that what affects HRQoL is complicated, including multiple clinical and sociodemographic variables. This underlines the need for further research. To ensure the best possible care, it is important that all healthcare professionals have easy access to knowledge about HRQoL in patients with colorectal cancer, and what impacts it in the last phase of life.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsQuality of LifeCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPalliative CareColorectal neoplasmsHealth-related quality of lifeMeta-analysisNursingPalliative careSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34530833
PMCPMC8447559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.