Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34530824›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2021

Privacy-preserving dataset combination and Lasso regression for healthcare predictions.

Marie Beth van Egmond, Gabriele Spini, Onno van der Galien, Arne IJpma, Thijs Veugen, Wessel Kraaij, Alex Sangers, Thomas Rooijakkers, Peter Langenkamp, Bart Kamphorst and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Marie Beth van EgmondUnit ICT, TNO (Dutch Organization for Applied Scientific Research), The Hague, The Netherlands. marie_beth.vanegmond@tno.nl.
Gabriele SpiniUnit ICT, TNO (Dutch Organization for Applied Scientific Research), The Hague, The Netherlands.
Onno van der GalienAchmea, Zeist, The Netherlands.
Arne IJpmaErasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Thijs VeugenUnit ICT, TNO (Dutch Organization for Applied Scientific Research), The Hague, The Netherlands.
Wessel KraaijUnit ICT, TNO (Dutch Organization for Applied Scientific Research), The Hague, The Netherlands.
Alex SangersUnit ICT, TNO (Dutch Organization for Applied Scientific Research), The Hague, The Netherlands.
Thomas RooijakkersUnit ICT, TNO (Dutch Organization for Applied Scientific Research), The Hague, The Netherlands.
Peter LangenkampUnit ICT, TNO (Dutch Organization for Applied Scientific Research), The Hague, The Netherlands.
Bart KamphorstUnit ICT, TNO (Dutch Organization for Applied Scientific Research), The Hague, The Netherlands.
Natasja van de L'IsleTMC Data Science, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Milena Kooij-JanicUnit ICT, TNO (Dutch Organization for Applied Scientific Research), The Hague, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent developments in machine learning have shown its potential impact for clinical use such as risk prediction, prognosis, and treatment selection. However, relevant data are often scattered across different stakeholders and their use is regulated, e.g. by GDPR or HIPAA. As a concrete use-case, hospital Erasmus MC and health insurance company Achmea have data on individuals in the city of Rotterdam, which would in theory enable them to train a regression model in order to identify high-impact lifestyle factors for heart failure. However, privacy and confidentiality concerns make it unfeasible to exchange these data.

methodsThis article describes a solution where vertically-partitioned synthetic data of Achmea and of Erasmus MC are combined using Secure Multi-Party Computation. First, a secure inner join protocol takes place to securely determine the identifiers of the patients that are represented in both datasets. Then, a secure Lasso Regression model is trained on the securely combined data. The involved parties thus obtain the prediction model but no further information on the input data of the other parties.

resultsWe implement our secure solution and describe its performance and scalability: we can train a prediction model on two datasets with 5000 records each and a total of 30 features in less than one hour, with a minimal difference from the results of standard (non-secure) methods.

conclusionsThis article shows that it is possible to combine datasets and train a Lasso regression model on this combination in a secure way. Such a solution thus further expands the potential of privacy-preserving data analysis in the medical domain.

Indexed as

ConfidentialityPrivacyComputer SecurityData AnalysisDelivery of Health CareHumansMachine LearningLasso regressionMachine learningPrivacySecure multi-party computation

Identifiers

PMID34530824
PMCPMC8445286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.