ArticleComputer methods and programs in biomedicine2021
Learning the impact of acute and chronic diseases on forecasting neonatal encephalopathy.
Article in Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification and Prediction of Chronic Diseases Using Machine Learning Approach.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThere is a wide range of risk factors predisposing to the onset of neonatal encephalopathy (NE), including maternal antepartum/intrapartum comorbidities or events. However, few studies have investigated the difference in the impact of acute and chronic diseases on forecasting NE, which could assist clinicians in choosing the best course of action to prevent NE or reduce its severity and complications. In this study, we aimed to engineer features based on acute and chronic diseases and assess the differences of the impact of acute and chronic diseases on NE prediction using machine learning models. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe used ten years of electronic health records of mothers from a large academic medical center to develop three types of features: chronic disease, recurrence of an acute disease, and temporal relationships between acute diseases. Two types of NE prediction models, based on acute and chronic diseases, respectively, were trained with feature selection. We further compared the prediction performance of the models with two state-of-the-art NE forecasting models. The machine learning models ranked the three types of engineered features based on their contributions to the NE prediction.
resultsThe NE model trained on acute disease features showed significantly higher AUC than the model relying on chronic disease features (AUC difference: 0.161, p-value < 0.001). The NE model trained on both acute and chronic disease features achieved the highest average AUC (0.889), with a significant improvement over the best existing model (0.854) with p = 0.0129. Recurrence of "known or suspected fetal abnormality affecting management of mother (655)" was assigned the highest weights in predicting NE.
conclusionsMachine learning models based on the three types of engineered features significantly improve NE prediction. Our results specifically suggest that acute disease-associated features play a more important role in predicting NE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.