Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34530315›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2021

Mobile phone sensor-based detection of subjective cannabis intoxication in young adults: A feasibility study in real-world settings.

Sang Won Bae, Tammy Chung, Rahul Islam, Brian Suffoletto, Jiameng Du, Serim Jang, Yuuki Nishiyama, Raghu Mulukutla, Anind Dey

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Discriminating Between Marijuana and Alcohol Gait Impairments Using Tile CNN With TICA Pooling.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Smartphone and Wearable Device-Based Digital Phenotyping to Understand Substance use and its Syndemics.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2024
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Sang Won BaeSchool of Systems and Enterprises, Stevens Institute of Technology, USA.
Tammy ChungInstitute for Health, Healthcare Policy and Aging Research, Rutgers University, USA. Electronic address: tammy.chung@rutgers.edu.
Rahul IslamSchool of Systems and Enterprises, Stevens Institute of Technology, USA.
Brian SuffolettoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University, USA.
Jiameng DuComputer Science Department, Carnegie Mellon University, USA.
Serim JangComputer Science Department, Carnegie Mellon University, USA.
Yuuki NishiyamaInstitute of Industrial Science, University of Tokyo, Japan.
Raghu MulukutlaComputer Science Department, Carnegie Mellon University, USA.
Anind DeyInformation School, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Carnegie Mellon University · USStevens Institute of Technology · USRutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights · NLStanford University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Real-time prediction of marijuana use & effects of use on cognition in the natural environmentR21DA043181 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CHUNG, TAMMY · 2017 to 2018
$430k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA043181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven possible impairment in psychomotor functioning related to acute cannabis intoxication, we explored whether smartphone-based sensors (e.g., accelerometer) can detect self-reported episodes of acute cannabis intoxication (subjective "high" state) in the natural environment.

methodsYoung adults (ages 18-25) in Pittsburgh, PA, who reported cannabis use at least twice per week, completed up to 30 days of daily data collection: phone surveys (3 times/day), self-initiated reports of cannabis use (start/stop time, subjective cannabis intoxication rating: 0-10, 10 = very high), and continuous phone sensor data. We tested multiple models with Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM) in distinguishing "not intoxicated" (rating = 0) vs subjective cannabis "low-intoxication" (rating = 1-3) vs "moderate-intensive intoxication" (rating = 4-10). We tested the importance of time features (i.e., day of the week, time of day) relative to smartphone sensor data only on model performance, since time features alone might predict "routines" in cannabis intoxication.

resultsYoung adults (N = 57; 58 % female) reported 451 cannabis use episodes, mean subjective intoxication rating = 3.77 (SD = 2.64). LGBM, the best performing classifier, had 60 % accuracy using time features to detect subjective "high" (Area Under the Curve [AUC] = 0.82). Combining smartphone sensor data with time features improved model performance: 90 % accuracy (AUC = 0.98). Important smartphone features to detect subjective cannabis intoxication included travel (GPS) and movement (accelerometer).

conclusionsThis proof-of-concept study indicates the feasibility of using phone sensors to detect subjective cannabis intoxication in the natural environment, with potential implications for triggering just-in-time interventions.

Indexed as

CannabisCell PhoneAdolescentAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSelf ReportSmartphoneYoung AdultAcute intoxicationCannabis smokingLight gradient boosting machine modelMobile phone sensors

Identifiers

PMID34530315
PMCPMC8595824
OpenAlexW3196682166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.