Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34530287›Full record

ArticleInfant behavior & development2021

The memory benefits of two naps per day during infancy: A pilot investigation.

Gina M Mason, Laura B F Kurdziel, Rebecca M C Spencer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infant behavior & development, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Practical Application of Polysomnography in Infants.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Exploring Developmental Connections: Sleep Patterns, Self-Locomotion, and Vocabulary Growth in Early Childhood.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gina M MasonDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, United States; Neuroscience & Behavior Program, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, United States.
Laura B F KurdzielDepartment of Psychology, Merrimack College, United States.
Rebecca M C SpencerDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, United States; Neuroscience & Behavior Program, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, United States; Institute for Applied Life Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, United States. Electronic address: rspencer@umass.edu.

Funding

The Benefits of Naps on Cognitive, Emotional and Motor Learning in PreschoolersR01HL111695 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI SPENCER, REBECCA M C · 2012 to 2020
$4.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL111695
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In infancy, sleep occurs in multiple nap and overnight bouts that change developmentally in quantity and distribution. Though studies suggest that infant memory benefits from a single nap, no work has assessed the relative benefits of different naps (morning vs. afternoon), nor how multiple naps support memory across the day. We investigated the memory benefit of a morning nap, relative to morning wake, and the effect of these intervals on afternoon nap function in 9-month-olds (n = 15). Infants participated in two within-subjects conditions (separated by 1-2 weeks). In the Nap-Nap condition, infants took their morning and afternoon naps; in the Wake-Nap condition, infants were kept awake during morning naptime, but napped unrestricted in the afternoon. Before each nap/wake interval, infants completed an imitation memory task, with memory assessed again shortly after the nap/wake interval. In the Nap-Nap condition, infants showed memory retention across morning and afternoon naps. In contrast, infants tended to forget items learned across morning wake in the Wake-Nap condition. Moreover, morning wake was associated with a significant decline in post-nap retention of items learned in the afternoon. Furthermore, relations between nap slow-wave activity (SWA) and memory varied across naps, with SWA either not predicting (morning naps) or positively predicting (afternoon naps) memory change in the Nap-Nap condition, but negatively predicting afternoon memory change in the Wake-Nap condition. We conclude that two naps per day (rather than one) aids memory at 9 months, and that skipping the morning nap may moderate relations between afternoon nap physiology and memory.

Indexed as

SleepWakefulnessHumansInfantLearningMemoryPilot Projectsdeclarative memoryinfancyNapspolysomnographyslow-wave activity

Identifiers

PMID34530287
PMCPMC8627454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.