Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34529860›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of clinical psychology2022

Exploring the association between social behaviour, trust, and its neural correlates in first episode psychosis patients and in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis.

Amanda Wisman-van der Teen, Imke L J Lemmers-Jansen, Margreet Oorschot, Lydia Krabbendam

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of clinical psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trust learning in the repeated trust game: A meta-analytic study.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Amanda Wisman-van der TeenYulius Mental Health, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1290-5723
Imke L J Lemmers-JansenDepartment of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Institute for Brain and Behaviour (IBBA) Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Margreet OorschotGGZ Delfland Mental Health Care, Delft, The Netherlands.
Lydia KrabbendamDepartment of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Institute for Brain and Behaviour (IBBA) Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
GGZ Delfland · NLKing's College London · GBVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLYulius · NL

Funding

ERC Consolidator grant 648082SCANSHersenstichting KS2011(1)-75Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 452-07-007Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 453-11-005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPsychosis is characterized by paranoid delusions, social withdrawal, and distrust towards others. Trust is essential for successful social interactions. It remains unknown which aspects of social functioning are associated with reduced trust in psychosis. Therefore, we investigated the association between social behaviour, trust, and its neural correlates in a group of individuals with psychotic symptoms (PS-group), consisting of first episode psychosis patients combined with individuals at clinical high risk.

methodsWe compared 24 PS individuals and 25 healthy controls. Affect and social withdrawal were assessed using the Experience Sampling Method. Trust was measured during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scanning, using a trust game with a cooperative and unfair counterpart.

resultsThe PS-group showed lower baseline trust compared to controls and reported less positive and more negative general affect. Social withdrawal did not differ between the groups. Social withdrawal and social reactivity in affect (i.e., changes in affect when with others compared to when alone) were not associated with trust. On the neural level, in controls but not in the PS-group, social withdrawal was associated with caudate activation during interactions with an unfair partner. An increase in positive social reactivity, was associated with reduced insula activation in the whole sample.

conclusionsSocial withdrawal and social reactivity were not associated with reduced initial trust in the PS-group. Like controls, the PS-group showed a positive response in affect when with others, suggesting a decrease in emotional distress. Supporting patients to keep engaging in social interactions, may alleviate their emotional distress. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Individuals with psychotic symptoms show reduced initial trust towards unknown others. Trust in others is not associated with social withdrawal and reported affect when with others, nor when alone. Like controls, individuals with psychotic symptoms showed reduced negative affect and increased positive affect when with others compared to when alone. We emphasize to support individuals with psychotic symptoms to keep engaging in social interactions, given it may reduce social withdrawal and alleviate their emotional distress.

Indexed as

Psychotic DisordersTrustEmotionsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingSocial Behaviorclinical high riskexperience sampling methodfirst episode psychosisfunctional magnetic resonance imagingSocial behaviourtrust

Identifiers

PMID34529860
PMCPMC9541290
OpenAlexW3201213605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.