Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34529779›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2021

Pharmacokinetics and safety of high-dose rifampicin in children with TB: the Opti-Rif trial.

Anthony J Garcia-Prats, Elin M Svensson, Jana Winckler, Heather R Draper, Lee Fairlie, Louvina E van der Laan, Masebole Masenya, H Simon Schaaf, Lubbe Wiesner, Jennifer Norman and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A clinical practice guideline for tuberculous meningitis.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Effectiveness and Pharmacokinetic Exposures of First-Line Drugs Used to Treat Drug-Susceptible Tuberculosis in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Randomized Clinical Trial of High-Dose Rifampicin With or Without Levofloxacin Versus Standard of Care for Pediatric Tuberculous Meningitis: The TBM-KIDS Trial.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Variability in plasma rifampicin concentrations and role ofInfectious diseases (London, England) · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. New and Repurposed Drugs for the Treatment of Active Tuberculosis: An Update for Clinicians.Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Childhood Tuberculosis: Historical Perspectives, Recent Advances, and a Call to Action.Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Anthony J Garcia-PratsDesmond Tutu TB Centre, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, PO Box 241, Cape Town 8000, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-9280-1950
Elin M SvenssonDepartment of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen (864), The Netherlands.
Jana WincklerDesmond Tutu TB Centre, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, PO Box 241, Cape Town 8000, South Africa.
Heather R DraperDesmond Tutu TB Centre, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, PO Box 241, Cape Town 8000, South Africa.
Lee FairlieWits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute Shandukani CRS, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, 22 Esselen Street, Hilbrow 2001, South Africa.
Louvina E van der LaanDesmond Tutu TB Centre, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, PO Box 241, Cape Town 8000, South Africa.
Masebole MasenyaWits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute Shandukani CRS, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, 22 Esselen Street, Hilbrow 2001, South Africa.
H Simon SchaafDesmond Tutu TB Centre, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, PO Box 241, Cape Town 8000, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-5755-4133
Lubbe WiesnerDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, K45 Old Main Building, Groote Schuur Hospital, Observatory, Cape Town 7925, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-9070-8699
Jennifer NormanDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, K45 Old Main Building, Groote Schuur Hospital, Observatory, Cape Town 7925, South Africa.
Rob E AarnoutseDepartment of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen (864), The Netherlands.
Mats O KarlssonDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, PO Box 580, 751 23 Uppsala, Sweden.
Paolo DentiDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, K45 Old Main Building, Groote Schuur Hospital, Observatory, Cape Town 7925, South Africa.
Anneke C HesselingDesmond Tutu TB Centre, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, PO Box 241, Cape Town 8000, South Africa.
Desmond Tutu HIV Foundation · ZAUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZAUppsala University · SERadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Leadership and Operations Center (LOC), AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG); LOC 1/UM1AI068636 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Joseph J Eron, RAJESH T GANDHI · 2011 to 2026
$1073.1M
LOC-IMPAACT Leadership GroupPharmacokinetics and Safety of Remdesivir for Treatment of COVID-19 in Pregnant Women in the USUM1AI068632 · NIAID · SOCIAL AND SCIENTIFIC SYSTEMS, INC. · PI Jennifer Jao, Sharon A Nachman · 2011 to 2026
$278.1M
Statistical and Data Management Center (SDMC), AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG)UM1AI068634 · NIAID · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI Marlene Ann Cooper, Michael David Hughes · 2011 to 2026
$246.6M
Validation, CLIA and Qualification (VQC): Enhancing the RS ratio as a tool for AIDS Clinical Trial Group (ACTG) tuberculosis trialsUM1AI106701 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Grace M Aldrovandi · 2014 to 2026
$116.8M
International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials (IMPAACT) GroupU01AI068632 · NIAID · SOCIAL AND SCIENTIFIC SYSTEMS, INC. · PI JACKSON, J BROOKS · 2006 to 2010
$109.7M
Wits HIV Research Group CLINICAL TRIAL UNIT (CTU) reapplicationUM1AI069463 · NIAID · WITS HEALTH CONSORTIUM (PTY), LTD · PI REES, HELEN, SANNE, IAN MATTHIAS · 2012 to 2025
$31.8M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI068632NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068632NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068634NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068636NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI069463NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI106701NICHD NIH HHSNIH HHS AI068632NIH HHS UM1 AI068634
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRifampicin doses of 40 mg/kg in adults are safe and well tolerated, may shorten anti-TB treatment and improve outcomes, but have not been evaluated in children.

objectivesTo characterize the pharmacokinetics and safety of high rifampicin doses in children with drug-susceptible TB. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe Opti-Rif trial enrolled dosing cohorts of 20 children aged 0-12 years, with incremental dose escalation with each subsequent cohort, until achievement of target exposures or safety concerns. Cohort 1 opened with a rifampicin dose of 15 mg/kg for 14 days, with a single higher dose (35 mg/kg) on day 15. Pharmacokinetic data from days 14 and 15 were analysed using population modelling and safety data reviewed. Incrementally increased rifampicin doses for the next cohort (days 1-14 and day 15) were simulated from the updated model, up to the dose expected to achieve the target exposure [235 mg/L·h, the geometric mean area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24) among adults receiving a 35 mg/kg dose].

resultsSixty-two children were enrolled in three cohorts. The median age overall was 2.1 years (range = 0.4-11.7). Evaluated doses were ∼35 mg/kg (days 1-14) and ∼50 mg/kg (day 15) for cohort 2 and ∼60 mg/kg (days 1-14) and ∼75 mg/kg (day 15) for cohort 3. Approximately half of participants had an adverse event related to study rifampicin; none was grade 3 or higher. A 65-70 mg/kg rifampicin dose was needed in children to reach the target exposure.

conclusionsHigh rifampicin doses in children achieved target exposures and the doses evaluated were safe over 2 weeks.

Indexed as

RifampinChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantRifampin

Identifiers

PMID34529779
PMCPMC8598292
OpenAlexW3200448135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.