Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34529698›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Revisiting the placental clock: Early corticotrophin-releasing hormone rise in recurrent preterm birth.

Christina L Herrera, Maria E Bowman, Donald D McIntire, David B Nelson, Roger Smith

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Development and function of the fetal adrenal.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Christina L HerreraDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6484-9850
Maria E BowmanMothers and Babies Research Centre, Hunter Medical Research Institute, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Donald D McIntireDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
David B NelsonDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
Roger SmithMothers and Babies Research Centre, Hunter Medical Research Institute, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USHunter Medical Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine if maternal plasma CRH and preterm birth history were associated with recurrent preterm birth risk in a high-risk cohort. STUDY

designSecondary analysis of pregnant women with a prior preterm birth ≤35 weeks receiving 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate for the prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth. All women with a 24-week blood sample were included. Maternal plasma CRH level at 24- and 32-weeks' gestation was measured using both enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and extracted radioimmunoassay (RIA) technologies. The primary outcome was spontaneous preterm birth <37 weeks. The association of CRH, prior preterm birth history, and the two combined was assessed in relation to recurrent preterm birth risk.

resultsRecurrent preterm birth in this cohort of 169 women was 24.9%. Comparing women who subsequently delivered <37 versus ≥37 weeks, mean levels of CRH measured by RIA were significantly different at 24 weeks (111.1±87.5 vs. 66.1±45.4 pg/mL, P = .002) and 32 weeks (440.9±275.6 vs. 280.2±214.5 pg/mL, P = .003). The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) at 24 and 32 weeks for (1) CRH level was 0.68 (95% CI 0.59-0.78) and 0.70 (95% CI 0.59-0.81), (2) prior preterm birth history was 0.75 (95% CI 0.67-0.83) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.69-0.87), and (3) combined was 0.81 (95% CI 0.73-0.88, P = .001) and 0.81 (95% CI 0.72-0.90, P = .01) respectively for delivery <37 weeks. CRH measured by ELISA failed to correlate with gestational age or other clinical parameters.

conclusionIn women with a prior preterm birth, CRH levels were higher and had an earlier rise in women who experienced recurrent preterm birth. Second trimester CRH may be useful in identifying a sub-group of women with preterm birth due to early activation of the placenta-fetal adrenal axis. Assay methodology is a variable that contributes to difficulties in reproducibility of CRH levels in the obstetric literature.

Indexed as

Premature Birth17 alpha-Hydroxyprogesterone CaproateAdultArea Under CurveCohort StudiesCorticotropin-Releasing HormoneEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleGestational AgeHumansPlacentaPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePrenatal CareProspective StudiesRadioimmunoassay17 alpha-Hydroxyprogesterone CaproateCorticotropin-Releasing Hormone

Identifiers

PMID34529698
PMCPMC8445461
OpenAlexW3199711488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.