Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34529664›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Epidemiology and molecular characterization of Theileria annulata in cattle from central Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.

Raqeeb Ullah, Sumaira Shams, Munsif Ali Khan, Sultan Ayaz, Noor Ul Akbar, Qeyam Ud Din, Adil Khan, Renato Leon, Jehan Zeb

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Molecular detection ofJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2024
    Article
  11. Prevalence ofPeerJ · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Prevalence and Risk Factors Associated withPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Molecular epidemiology, associated risk factors, and phylogeny ofIranian journal of veterinary research · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Raqeeb UllahDepartment of Zoology, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Mardan, Pakistan.
Sumaira ShamsDepartment of Zoology, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Mardan, Pakistan.
Munsif Ali KhanDepartment of Zoology, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Mardan, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-7140-3400
Sultan AyazCollege of Veterinary Sciences & Animal Husbandry, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Mardan, Pakistan.
Noor Ul AkbarDepartment of Zoology, Kohat University of Science and Technology, Kohat, Pakistan.
Qeyam Ud DinDepartment of Geography, University of Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Adil KhanDepartment of Zoology, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Mardan, Pakistan.
Renato LeonMedical Entomology & Tropical Medicine Laboratory LEMMT, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador.
Jehan ZebDepartment of Zoology, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Mardan, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-5565-9935
Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan · PKKohat University of Science and Technology · PKUniversidad San Francisco de Quito · ECUniversity of Peshawar · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theileria annulata is a tick-borne hemoprotozoan parasite responsible for tropical theileriosis in the bovine population, which causes substantial economic losses to the livestock sector. The present study has investigated, characterized, and shaped epidemiologic and phylogenetic profiles of T. annulata infection in the cattle population of central Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. A total of 600 blood samples were collected from cattle. Microscopy and PCR (18S rRNA taxonomic marker) assays were performed to detect T. annulata infection in cattle from the study area. The overall relative prevalence rates of T. annulata in the examined cattle population were 12.8% (microscopy) and 23.7% (PCR). District-wise analysis (microscopy/PCR) showed that cattle from district Mardan were found more infected (16.0%/28.0%), as compared to cattle from district Charsadda (13.5%/25.5%) and district Peshawar (9.0%/17.5%). Based on host demographic and ecological parameters analysis, theileriosis was found to be higher in young, female, crossbred, freely grazing, tick-infested, and irregular/no acaricides treated cattle. The univariate logistic analysis showed that host age, tick infestation, acaricides use, and feeding method were significant risk factors (P<0.05) whereas multivariate analysis indicated that host age, gender, tick infestation, acaricidal application, and feeding method were potential risk factors (P<0.05) for tropical theileriosis in the cattle population. Phylogenetic and sequence analysis showed that T. annulata 18S rRNA isolates shared homology and phylogeny with other isolates from Asia and Europe. This study has addressed the epidemiology and phylogeny of T. annulata circulating in bovid in the study area where gaps were still present. These findings will serve as a baseline and will facilitate future large-scale epidemiological investigations on tropical theileriosis in the cattle population at a national level.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAnimalsCattleCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleMalePakistanPhylogenyPrevalenceRisk FactorsRNA, Ribosomal, 18STheileria annulataTheileriasisTick InfestationsRNA, Ribosomal, 18S

Identifiers

PMID34529664
PMCPMC8445462
OpenAlexW3200926007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.