Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34529654›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Machine learning approach for automatic recognition of tomato-pollinating bees based on their buzzing-sounds.

Alison Pereira Ribeiro, Nádia Felix Felipe da Silva, Fernanda Neiva Mesquita, Priscila de Cássia Souza Araújo, Thierson Couto Rosa, José Neiva Mesquita-Neto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alison Pereira RibeiroInstituto de Informática, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiánia, Goiás, Brazil.
Nádia Felix Felipe da SilvaInstituto de Informática, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiánia, Goiás, Brazil.
Fernanda Neiva MesquitaInstituto de Informática, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiánia, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2010-4088
Priscila de Cássia Souza AraújoPrograma de Pós-graduação em Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Thierson Couto RosaInstituto de Informática, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiánia, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7117-3994
José Neiva Mesquita-NetoCentro de Investigación en Estudios Avanzados del Maule, Vicerrectoría de Investigación y Postgrado, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-1519-638X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bee-mediated pollination greatly increases the size and weight of tomato fruits. Therefore, distinguishing between the local set of bees-those that are efficient pollinators-is essential to improve the economic returns for farmers. To achieve this, it is important to know the identity of the visiting bees. Nevertheless, the traditional taxonomic identification of bees is not an easy task, requiring the participation of experts and the use of specialized equipment. Due to these limitations, the development and implementation of new technologies for the automatic recognition of bees become relevant. Hence, we aim to verify the capacity of Machine Learning (ML) algorithms in recognizing the taxonomic identity of visiting bees to tomato flowers based on the characteristics of their buzzing sounds. We compared the performance of the ML algorithms combined with the Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC) and with classifications based solely on the fundamental frequency, leading to a direct comparison between the two approaches. In fact, some classifiers powered by the MFCC-especially the SVM-achieved better performance compared to the randomized and sound frequency-based trials. Moreover, the buzzing sounds produced during sonication were more relevant for the taxonomic recognition of bee species than analysis based on flight sounds alone. On the other hand, the ML classifiers performed better in recognizing bees genera based on flight sounds. Despite that, the maximum accuracy obtained here (73.39% by SVM) is still low compared to ML standards. Further studies analyzing larger recording samples, and applying unsupervised learning systems may yield better classification performance. Therefore, ML techniques could be used to automate the taxonomic recognition of flower-visiting bees of the cultivated tomato and other buzz-pollinated crops. This would be an interesting option for farmers and other professionals who have no experience in bee taxonomy but are interested in improving crop yields by increasing pollination.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAcousticsAlgorithmsAnimalsBeesComputational BiologyCrops, AgriculturalFlowersPollinationSolanum lycopersicum

Identifiers

PMID34529654
PMCPMC8478199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.