ReviewUnited European gastroenterology journal2021
Endoscopic management of duodenal adenomatosis in familial adenomatous polyposis-A case-based review.
Review in United European gastroenterology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Familial Adenomatous Polyposis-Risk of Cancer, Cancer Prevention, and Long-Term Consequences: Learnings from Five Decades with the Danish Polyposis Register.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2026Review
- Genetic differences in familial adenomatous polyposis syndrome in a Hungarian population: A prospective single center study.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Challenging Aspects of Familial Adenomatous Polyposis With Malignant Transformation: A Report of Two Cases.Cureus · 2025Article
- Laboratory variation in the grading of dysplasia of duodenal adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis patients.Familial cancer · 2023Article
- Review
- Risk factors for the occurrence of ampullary tumors: A case-control study.United European gastroenterology journal · 2022Article
- Guidelines, top-notch science & social media-Jump on the bandwagon.United European gastroenterology journal · 2022Article
- Advantages of total proctocolectomy with straight ileoanal anastomosis plus pedicled omental transposition for familial adenomatous polyposis: a preliminary study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adenomatous polyposis (AP) diseases, including familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), attenuated FAP (AFAP), and MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP), are the second most common hereditary causes of colorectal cancer. A frequent extra-colonic manifestation of AP disease is duodenal polyposis, which may lead to duodenal cancer in up to 18% of AP patients. Endoscopic surveillance is recommended at 0.5- to 5-year intervals depending on the extent of polyp growth and histological progression. Although the Spigelman classification is traditionally used to determine surveillance intervals, it lacks information on the (peri-)ampullary site, where 50% of duodenal carcinomas are located. Hence, information on the papilla has recently been added as a prognostic marker. Patients with duodenal adenoma(s) ≥10 mm and ampullary adenomas of any size are suggested to be referred to an expert center for endoscopic therapy, particularly endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic ampullectomy. Nonetheless, despite the logic of this approach, the long-term efficacy of endoscopic therapy is still to be demonstrated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.