Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34529332›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2021

Initial analysis of the dosimetric benefit and clinical resource cost of CBCT-based online adaptive radiotherapy for patients with cancers of the cervix or rectum.

Adam D Yock, Mahmoud Ahmed, Diandra Ayala-Peacock, A Bapsi Chakravarthy, Michael Price

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adam D YockDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Mahmoud AhmedDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Diandra Ayala-PeacockDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
A Bapsi ChakravarthyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Michael PriceDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Funding

Varian Medical Systems VUMC74894
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis provides a benchmark of dosimetric benefit and clinical cost of cone-beam CT-based online adaptive radiotherapy (ART) technology for cervical and rectal cancer patients.

methodsAn emulator of a CBCT-based online ART system was used to simulate more than 300 treatments for 13 cervical and 15 rectal cancer patients. CBCT images were used to generate adaptive replans. To measure clinical resource cost, the six phases of the workflow were timed. To evaluate the dosimetric benefit, changes in dosimetric values were assessed. These included minimum dose (Dmin) and volume receiving 95% of prescription (V95%) for the planning target volume (PTV) and the clinical target volume (CTV), and maximum 2 cc's (D2cc) of the bladder, bowel, rectum, and sigmoid colon.

resultsThe average duration of the workflow was 24.4 and 9.2 min for cervical and rectal cancer patients, respectively. A large proportion of time was dedicated to editing target contours (13.1 and 2.7 min, respectively). For cervical cancer patients, the replan changed the Dmin to the PTVs and CTVs for each fraction 0.25 and 0.25 Gy, respectively. The replan changed the V95% by 9.2 and 7.9%. The D2cc to the bladder, bowel, rectum, and sigmoid colon for each fraction changed -0.02, -0.08, -0.07, and -0.04 Gy, respectively. For rectal cancer patients, the replan changed the Dmin to the PTVs and CTVs for each fraction of 0.20 and 0.24 Gy, respectively. The replan changed the V95% by 4.1 and 1.5%. The D2cc to the bladder and bowel for each fraction changed 0.02 and -0.02 Gy, respectively.

conclusionsDosimetric benefits can be achieved with CBCT-based online ART that is amenable to conventional appointment slots. The clinical significance of these benefits remains to be determined. Managing contours was the primary factor affecting the total duration and is imperative for safe and effective adaptive radiotherapy.

Indexed as

Radiotherapy, Image-GuidedRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedSpiral Cone-Beam Computed TomographyUterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleHumansRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRectumadaptive radiotherapyadaptive replanningadaptive therapyARTmotion managementonline adaptive radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID34529332
PMCPMC8504593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.