Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34529249›Full record

ArticleSpine deformity2022

Risk factors for the development of DJK in AIS patients undergoing posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion.

Dale N Segal, Jacob Ball, Nicholas D Fletcher, Eric Yoon, Tracey Bastrom, Michael G Vitale, Harms Study Group

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Spine deformity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Costs of revision operations for distal junctional kyphosis following thoracic posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dale N SegalDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jacob BallDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia Universityl, New York, NY, USA.
Nicholas D FletcherDepartmennt of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, 57 Executive Park S., Stre. 120, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA. nicholas.d.fletcher@emory.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3479-9845
Eric YoonDepartmennt of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, 57 Executive Park S., Stre. 120, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
Tracey BastromRady Children's Specialists, San Diego, CA, USA.
Michael G VitaleDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia Universityl, New York, NY, USA.
Harms Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTypically, selection of lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) is based on the coronal radiograph; however, increasing evidence suggests that fusions proximal to the stable sagittal vertebrae (SSV) on the lateral radiograph can result in distal junctional kyphosis (DJK). The purpose of this study is to compare rates of DJK in patients with AIS that have a discordance between the Lowest Touched Vertebra (LTV) and the SSV and to identify risk factors for developing DJK.

methodsPatients with AIS Lenke type 1, 2 and 3 curves treated with a posterior spinal fusion were separated into two groups. Group 1 had SSV that was proximal to the LTV whereas group 2 had SSV that was distal to the LTV. Comparisons were made for patients that were fused to the SSV(a), LTV(b) or between(c). Distal junctional angle (DJA) > 5° and increasing kyphosis at the end of the fusion construct were evaluated as risk factors for DJK.

resultsThe rate of DJK was 0.0% in group 1a, 1b, and 1c compared to 4.3%, 18.5% and 10.0% in groups 2a, 2b and 2c, respectively(p < 0.001). The rate of DJK was 22.9% when the distal junctional angle(DJA) > 5° versus 1.4% when the DJA < 5°(p < 0.001).

conclusionThere was a low risk for progression of DJK when the SSV was proximal to the LTV, however, those with SSV distal to the LTV represent a high-risk group. Importantly, the development of DJK occurred almost exclusively in patients with LIV at the thoracolumbar junction which demonstrates that surgeons need to be cautious when ending fusions at T11, T12, and L1 in patients at high risk for DJK. Furthermore, having a distal junctional angle 5° or greater increased the risk of developing DJK by roughly 16-fold. At a minimum of 5-year follow-up, the development of DJK did not appear to adversely impact SRS outcomes or revision rates.

Indexed as

KyphosisScoliosisAdolescentHumansPostoperative ComplicationsRisk FactorsThoracic VertebraeAdolescent idiopathic scoliosisDistal junctional kyphosisPosterior spinal fusionStable sagittal vertebra

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.