ArticleSpine deformity2022
Risk factors for the development of DJK in AIS patients undergoing posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion.
Article in Spine deformity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting the Risk of Distal Junctional Kyphosis After Surgery for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Using Preoperative Radiographic Indicators and Machine Learning.Global spine journal · 2026Article
- Risk factors for PJK and DJF in operatively corrected adult patients with congenital hemivertebra.Spine deformity · 2026Article
- Correlation between postoperative shoulder imbalance and distal adding-on and distal junctional kyphosis in Lenke type 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a retospective study.Asian spine journal · 2026Article
- Is fusion to the stable sagittal vertebra necessary to avoid distal junctional kyphosis in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?Spine deformity · 2026Article
- Impact of Sagittal Reference Lines on Predicting Distal Junctional Kyphosis in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Article
- LIV selection in 'tweener' patients treated with magnetically controlled growing rods vs. posterior spinal fusion.Spine deformity · 2025Article
- Long-term outcomes of spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a literature review.European journal of medical research · 2024Review
- Costs of revision operations for distal junctional kyphosis following thoracic posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Risk factors for distal junctional kyphosis after posterior spinal surgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTypically, selection of lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) is based on the coronal radiograph; however, increasing evidence suggests that fusions proximal to the stable sagittal vertebrae (SSV) on the lateral radiograph can result in distal junctional kyphosis (DJK). The purpose of this study is to compare rates of DJK in patients with AIS that have a discordance between the Lowest Touched Vertebra (LTV) and the SSV and to identify risk factors for developing DJK.
methodsPatients with AIS Lenke type 1, 2 and 3 curves treated with a posterior spinal fusion were separated into two groups. Group 1 had SSV that was proximal to the LTV whereas group 2 had SSV that was distal to the LTV. Comparisons were made for patients that were fused to the SSV(a), LTV(b) or between(c). Distal junctional angle (DJA) > 5° and increasing kyphosis at the end of the fusion construct were evaluated as risk factors for DJK.
resultsThe rate of DJK was 0.0% in group 1a, 1b, and 1c compared to 4.3%, 18.5% and 10.0% in groups 2a, 2b and 2c, respectively(p < 0.001). The rate of DJK was 22.9% when the distal junctional angle(DJA) > 5° versus 1.4% when the DJA < 5°(p < 0.001).
conclusionThere was a low risk for progression of DJK when the SSV was proximal to the LTV, however, those with SSV distal to the LTV represent a high-risk group. Importantly, the development of DJK occurred almost exclusively in patients with LIV at the thoracolumbar junction which demonstrates that surgeons need to be cautious when ending fusions at T11, T12, and L1 in patients at high risk for DJK. Furthermore, having a distal junctional angle 5° or greater increased the risk of developing DJK by roughly 16-fold. At a minimum of 5-year follow-up, the development of DJK did not appear to adversely impact SRS outcomes or revision rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34529249What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.