Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34529234›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical psychology in medical settings2023

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Efforts at a Departmental Level: Building a Committee as a Vehicle for Advancing Progress.

Katherine A Lingras, M Elizabeth Alexander, Danielle M Vrieze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Embedding equity and inclusion in universities through motivational theory and community-based conservation approaches.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katherine A LingrasPsychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota Medical School, 2450 Riverside Ave., 2A West, Minneapolis, MN, 55454, USA. klingras@umn.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3396-4319
M Elizabeth AlexanderChild and Adolescent Psychology, Hennepin Healthcare Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Danielle M VriezePsychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota Medical School, 2450 Riverside Ave., 2A West, Minneapolis, MN, 55454, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Academic Health Centers (AHCs) across the nation are experiencing a reawakening to the importance of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI). Such work impacts both employees and patients served by healthcare institutions. Yet, for departments without previously existing formal channels for this work, it is not always apparent where to begin. The current manuscript details a process for creating a committee as a vehicle for championing DEI efforts at the department level within an AHC. The authors present a six-step model for forming a DEI Committee and progress monitoring measures to remain accountable to identified objectives. In each step, the authors provide examples of their work with the goal for readers to tailor and apply each step to their own departments' DEI efforts. The current paper also identifies lessons learned with regard to barriers and facilitators of department-level DEI work. Reflections and next steps for DEI work beyond the proposed model are also discussed.

Indexed as

Diversity, Equity, InclusionSocial ResponsibilityHumansClimateDepartmental initiativesDiversityEquityInclusion

Identifiers

PMID34529234
PMCPMC8444514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.