Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34529195›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2021

Genetic testing in women with early-onset breast cancer: a Traceback pilot study.

Annelie Augustinsson, Martin P Nilsson, Carolina Ellberg, Ulf Kristoffersson, Håkan Olsson, Hans Ehrencrona

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Annelie AugustinssonCancer Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. annelie.augustinsson@med.lu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3415-0536
Martin P NilssonOncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7419-6750
Carolina EllbergCancer Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7297-0645
Ulf KristofferssonClinical Genetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2967-735X
Håkan OlssonCancer Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8794-9635
Hans EhrencronaClinical Genetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5589-3622
Lund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn Sweden, a Traceback approach, i.e., a retrospective genetic outreach activity, among cancer patients is not normally used in clinical practice. In this pilot study, we wanted to evaluate a Traceback strategy for possible future clinical implementation and investigate why not all women with early-onset breast cancer underwent genetic testing when they were first diagnosed.

methodsOut of all women (n = 409) diagnosed with breast cancer at ≤ 35 years in Southern Sweden between 2000 and 2017, 63 had not previously been tested. These women were offered an analysis of the genes BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, CHEK2, and ATM through a standardized letter. Subsequently, women with normal test results were informed through a letter and carriers of pathogenic variants were contacted through a telephone call and offered in-person genetic counseling. All tested women were asked to complete a follow-up questionnaire regarding previously not having attended genetic counseling and testing and their experiences of the current retrospective approach.

resultsOut of the invited women, 29 (46%) underwent genetic testing and 27 (43%) answered the questionnaire. Pathogenic variants were identified in BRCA1 (n = 2), CHEK2 (n = 1), and ATM (n = 1). The main reason for previously not having undergone genetic testing was not having received any information from their physicians. Most study participants were satisfied with both written pre- and post-test information.

conclusionThe process with retrospective identification, written pre-test information, and genetic testing, followed by in-person counseling for carriers of pathogenic variants only, was well accepted. This has implications for future Traceback implementation programs.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingGerm-Line MutationHumansPilot ProjectsRetrospective StudiesBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBRCA1BRCA2Breast cancerEarly-onsetGenetic testing

Identifiers

PMID34529195
PMCPMC8443966
OpenAlexW3199784514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.